Re: Moving gkrellm to Extras?
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl) said:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some time ago there was mention of moving gkrellm to Extras in the
>> Moving ImageMagick to Extras thread.
>>
>> I volunteered to maintain gkrellm and put it through the review process.
>> But I've had no response sofar. Does this mean gkrelmm is going to stay
>> in Core? Thats fine with me too.
>
> I'm ok with it in Extras from a logical point of view, leaving aside
> any maintainership/review issues.
>
It doesn't really matter much to me, it seems well taken care of in
Core, but as said if the maintainer wants to get his hands free for
something else, then I'm game.
It is a really low maintenance package, but I have no objections against
moving it to Extras. It's yours if you'd like to have it.
Karsten
It could really use a cleanup packaging wise though. The wireless plugin
really should be packaged seperatly.
Yes, it is easier to get a new package in Extras than it is in RHEL ;-)
Karsten
--
Karsten Hopp <karsten(a)redhat.de> GPG 1024D/70ABD02C
Fingerprint D2D4 3B6B 2DE4 464C A432 210A DFF8 A140 70AB D02C
Red Hat Deutschland, Hauptstaetter Str.58
70178 Stuttgart, Tel.+49-711-96437-0, Fax +49-711-96437-111