Re: Non-responsive maintainer process for kurzawa / Krzysztof Kurzawski
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> writes:
IMHO, a consecutive week or longer without being online (there are
usually
ways to check your mail when on vacation, if not, see the next point) and
with no preannouncement (that's what the Vacation page in the wiki is for!)
is enough to constitute non-responsiveness on its own
You *seriously* need to get a life. The above sort of standard might be
reasonable for people who were getting paid to do Fedora packaging, but
a large fraction of Fedora packagers aren't.
(Not that kurzawa doesn't seem to be well past the threshold of
reasonable responsiveness. But people are allowed to take two-week
vacations without having to answer to FESCO for it.)
regards, tom lane