On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 07:58:14AM +0000, Mattia Verga wrote:
> As you may have read in the announcement on the devel mailing list, I've
> started a change proposal about bumping Pyramid to version 2.0 for F38.
> I cross-announce here because Pyramid and its dependencies are mostly
> maintained by infra-sig and I don't want to bypass main-admins, but I
> think it's time to move forward (and I have some projects about using
> pyramid-openapi3 to provide REST APIs in Bodhi which will need Pyramid 2).
>
> I intend to upgrade Pyramid and rebuild dependent packages also updating
> spec files to latest packaging guidelines and possibly upgrade packages
> to the latest versions. The list of packages is:
>
> * python-pyramid - Maintained by kevin / infra-sig
> * bodhi-server - Maintained by humaton
> * python-cornice - Maintained by hguemar / python-packagers-sig
> * python-pyramid-fas-openid - Maintained by abompard / infra-sig
> * python-pyramid-mako - Maintained by kevin / infra-sig
> * python-pyramid-tm - Maintained by kevin / infra-sig
> * python-pyramid_sawing - Maintained by abompard
>
> The dependent packages rebuild is not really needed, but it will ensure
> that the tests will not fail with Pyramid 2.0. In fact,
> python-pyramid-mako is the only one which needs an upgrade to be
> compatible with Pyramid 2.0.
> I have set up a COPR repository to test the upgrade:
>
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mattia/Pyramid2/
>
> Let me know if there's any objection to the proposal.
No objection at all from me. ;)
I have been very conservative in updating this stack since I don't want
to break bodhi. If we can upgrade things and confirm bodhi is happy I am
all for it. ;)
kevin
Upstream "pip-based" tests have been running for some time now using
Pyramid 2.0 from pypi, so I don't think anything will be broken.
Mattia