On Friday, May 20, 2011 05:07:32 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Friday, May 20, 2011 04:36:40 PM Matt_Domsch(a)dell.com wrote:
> This is the first release we're doing since moving the master mirrors
> from Red Hat I/T control to our control.
>
> With that, we dropped all the historical mirrors that were using
>
download.fedora.redhat.com and were in its rsync ACLs, forcing people to
> use the tiering.
>
> Right now, we have only a few mirrors reporting having the content (per
> the mirrorlists):
http://mirror.pnl.gov/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/
>
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/15/Fedora/
>
ftp://mirror.cs.princeton.edu/pub/mirrors/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora
> /
http://mirror.seas.harvard.edu/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/
>
http://mirror.web-ster.com/fedora/releases/15/Fedora/
>
http://mirror.hiwaay.net/pub/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/
>
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/
>
> Should we consider:
> a) force mirrors to change to tiering if they want the bits before Day 0.
> b) opening up the restrictions on dl.fp.o so the historical mirrors don't
> have to make changes (at a cost of bandwidth from dl*) c) bitflipping
> really early (e.g. ~now)
We dont need to bitflip, we can just make it so its
available via rsync but not
via http or ftp
> d) stop using bitflipping entirely
>
> ?
>
> Thoughts?
This should have gone to the releng list, i guess people dont pay
attention to things during Beta and Alpha since it was all setup this way
there.
I think i had 1 or 2 people ask questions for Alpha and Beta, and i just
added them to the acl list.
Dennis