On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, noriko wrote:
hi,
Sorry replying after closing the ticket, I was traveling Japan last two
weeks and had no internet connection. Now I like you all involved to
reconsider this RFR.
As Jared pointed, it was clearly agreed to revisit. This offer is great
opportunity for all translators to test new tool which has potential to
be hosted at Fedora ground. And as Mike said, the conversation should
start with translators, so that we will be able to come back. It is best
to have a test instance within fp.o.
Please notice that this RFR is just asking a test, not a move. As
someone refer to the need or the cost (people power or $$), without
testing, translators will not be able to evaluate those whether it is
worth or not. I like you all to remind that it is not zero cost but it
does cost running transifex for Fedora at
tx.net as well, manpower of
Infidex.
I have been strong supporter of Transifex, and still am confident that
Transifex is excellent tool for translators in some projects. However
there is no reason to deny other tools because it was just
developed/introduced after Transifex. Most of translators even do not
notice this discussion. I beg you, please give us a chance and let us
discuss ourselves before making any decision somewhere we do not know.
Please do not squash the opportunity for us.
They don't notice the discussion because no one has taken it there. I'm
not sure why we're even still discussing this here since not a single
email has been sent to
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/trans/ wrt
Zanata. It's not free for us to just hand over resources that could be
better planned. So I suggest again, start with the translators. If
someone on the infrastructure team is willing to sponsor it I'm sure
they'll speak up but it'd be a much better sell if the translation team
actually got together and said "sure, lets take a look"
-Mike
noriko
Ruediger Landmann さんは書きました:
> Thanks all for the feedback and comments; some of it has been extremely
> useful.
>
> I concur that it's premature to tie up Fedora resources in such a test;
> I'll investigate other hosting avenues and reopen the discussion here
> only if Zanata looks promising and after I have some buy-in from L10N.
>
> Cheers
> Rudi
>
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure