Dne 28.4.2017 v 12:27 Ryan Lerch napsal(a):
On Fri., 28 Apr. 2017 at 6:05 pm, Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com
<mailto:vondruch@redhat.com>> wrote:
Dne 28.4.2017 v 07:34 Chenxiong Qi napsal(a):
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
<pingou(a)pingoured.fr <mailto:pingou@pingoured.fr>> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:29:28AM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/25/2017 10:23 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>>>> (adding the releng list on CC, please keep the reply on the
infra list)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Following up on the thread about pagure on the top of
dist-git started a
>>>> few days ago Ralph Bean, Matthew Prahl and I had a quick
meeting just a few
>>>> minutes ago about the future of pkgdb.
>>>>
>>> Will pkgdb go away? It looks Pagure would be a data store
combining package
>>> repositories and pkgdb data together. From my point of view,
pkgdb could
>>> still sit between packagers and Pagure rather than exposing
lower level data
>>> directly as an interface of package data (whatever it comes
from Pagure or
>>> PDC) to packagers and existing tools like pkgdb-cli. If
anything of my
>>> understand about current pkgdb is not accurate, just scratch
my thought :)
>> The idea is indeed to retire pkgdb. However, I'm not sure I
follow why you would
>> prefer to keep it and what you don't like about dropping it.
Could you expand
>> your thoughts a little more?
> I thought "pkgdb" would become a main interface for anyone who wants
> to lookup package information without need to interact with
Pagure or
> PDC directly, meanwhile we can keep using current terms about
packages
> e.g. main contacts, that would be easier for anyone to get involved
> and start to contribute.
I support this. For me is the pkgdb entry point. If I want to know
something about package, I'm going to take a look into pkgdb. I'll be
missing its simple UI.
Vít
There is also the packages app that provides information on packages
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel
I know ... but honestly, this one is unusable ... starting by the ton of
slow javascript which often fails, ending with wrong information such as
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/rubygems/
Vít
--ryanlerch
>
> Will current pkgdb API[1] be still available, or need to query from
> Pagure or PDC individually?
>
> Actually, I don't insist on not drop pkgdb. Whatever it'll be
dropped
> or not and whatever the form it will be, as long as it could make
> things easier for packagers and potential contributors. :)
>
> [1]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/api/
>
>> Thanks,
>> Pierre
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infrastructure mailing list --
infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list --
infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to
infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org>
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org