On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 01:57:34PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 12:47 PM Pavel Raiskup
<praiskup(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On pondělí 4. září 2023 15:35:41 CEST Michal Konecny wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I finished investigation for migration from registry.fp.o to quay.io. It
> > is available in ARC investigation document [0]. The investigation ticket
> > [1] is on fedora-infra tracker.
>
> JFYI, Mock switched to "--use-bootstrap-image" (podman pulling images
> from various registries by default) and we had no single issue reported
> against the Fedora's registry, but CentOS (on quay.io) gives us random
> "pull" failures:
>
>
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/1191
>
> So the stability might not be as ideal as with the current registry.
Huh, good to know.
Is this something anyone has taken to upstream quay.io?
I'm not super-enthused about this from a few perspectives:
1. Core artifacts should be able to be produced, hosted, and consumed
from Fedora infrastructure.
Well, they still are in koji of course...
2. Quay ultimately does not need to care about Fedora as a
stakeholder
Sure, but do we have complex needs that require stakeholderness (ok,
thats not a word, but you know what I mean. ;)
3. Quay.io is moving into console.redhat.com[a], which makes it even
less
fun since RH accounts for the console require giving a lot more
information.
Huh, good to know. Of course the vast majority of people will just pull
from it, never look at the ui.
I think it would be good for us to try and talk to quay.io folks and see
if there's any issues or reasons not to head that way.
kevin