Hi,
I created the tags as module-epel8-build and
module-epel8-playground-build just to be consistent with the naming, so you
need to change the config for koji_tag part.
And may be also change the "stream" in the yaml file to epel8 and
epel8-playground and change the name of the platform to platform-epel8 and
platform-epel8-playground, again just for consistency.
Other than that, its LGTM.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 3:43 PM Merlin Mathesius <mmathesi(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Now that the build tags have been created (thanks, Mohan!), we should
be
ready to add the virtual platform module definitions for EPEL-8 to Fedora
staging MBS.
I have attached a revised patch that includes both the el8 and
el8-playground definitions in a single patch file. Aside from the combined
patch, the only difference from the previous separate patches is the
addition of the 'default_modules_scm_url' and 'use_default_modules'
settings to enable ursa prime.
Thanks.
Merlin
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 5:07 PM Merlin Mathesius <mmathesi(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:41 PM Matt Prahl <mprahl(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Merlin,
>> I can't think of anything that you need to do before merging and
>> deploying them as long as the Koji tags mentioned in the modulemd files are
>> all set.
>>
>
> Of course. We need the module-el8-build and module-el8-playground-build
> tags. I just created
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8865 for that.
>
> Thanks, Matt!
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:12 PM Merlin Mathesius <mmathesi(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Matt, Jan,
>>>
>>> Could one of you provide some input here?
>>>
>>> We're looking to add the virtual platform module definitions for EPEL-8
>>> to Fedora staging MBS. Is there anything specific that needs to happen
>>> before merging and deploying them?
>>>
>>> If you'd like to review the definitions, the patches are re-attached to
>>> this message so you don't need to go digging.
>>>
>>> Merlin
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 11:43 AM Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 02:14:14PM -0500, Merlin Mathesius wrote:
>>>> > Hi, all,
>>>> >
>>>> > Since folks seem to be happy with the el8 platform virtual module
>>>> > definitions, can they be merged and deployed to staging--or does
>>>> something
>>>> > else need to happen first? (Of course, any module builds based on
>>>> > platform:el8* won't be usable until there are corresponding
pungi
>>>> configs.)
>>>>
>>>> I'm not entirely sure. :)
>>>>
>>>> Can we ask some of the mbs folks what all is needed here?
>>>>
>>>> kevin
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>>>>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>>>> List Guidelines:
>>>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>>> List Archives:
>>>>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora...
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Matt Prahl
>>
>> Senior Software Engineer, PnT DevOps
>>
>> Red Hat <
https://www.redhat.com/>
>>
>> Westford, MA
>>
>> mprahl(a)redhat.com
>> M: 802-999-0972 IM: mprahl
>> <
https://red.ht/sig>
>>
> _______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora...