Infra docs formatting

Hi there, I'm working on a project[0] to build a documentation website using buildbot. We have plenty of publican books for me to play with, but I'd also like to enable other formats. ReStructuredText[1] seems like a good first choice, as it's easy to learn and use (just squint and pretend it's markdown, if you aren't familiar), and there are processors for it at hand. Anerist is centered around consuming git repositories. Ultimately, I'd like the site to offer the both user and contributor facing documentation. I also need a repo full of RST content to bang out implementation details. infra-docs.git seems ideally positioned to help out here, and any time invested would carry forward to the end product. Each article would need some kind of header[2] to work at scale, though. So, what does the infrastructure team think about writing in RST? If I'm willing to convert everything over, are you willing to sustain it? --Pete [0] slowly, anyway... https://github.com/immanetize/anerist [1] http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html [1b] more digestable: http://www.getnikola.com/quickstart.html [2] Probably something like https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2015-March/016101.html, discussion encouraged.