Re: pastebin plans

On 5/20/19 12:56 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:

I don't see that running our own pastebin is valuable to the community. There are plenty of other options for people to post things (pastebin.com, GitHub gists, put a file in your web space on Fedora people, etc). I'm in favor of option 3, with a long enough timeline for the fpaste maintainers to handle the change and for the docs team to make sure we update any docs that refer to pase.fp.o accordingly (if any)

+1 to Option 3.

My biggest use for paste.fp.o is via fpaste in CLI. To me, it also makes more sense to use an existing service and point the fpaste tool there. So long as fpaste continues to work, my use case and likely others' does not break.