1:08 p.m.
Since amarok-2.0.x has issues with qt-4.5.1, and 2.1 final will be
landing soon, I got amarok upstream blessing for us to pursue and test
some amarok-2.1 builds for updates(testing) purposes.
So, these will be landing in kde-redhat/testing asap, and in fedora
updates-testing over the next week or so.
caveat: F-10 builds are currently lacking libgpod support, I've been in
contact with libgpod maintainer, and the required libgpod-0.7.0 will be
coming soon to F-10. This is a blocker for amarok-2.1 to land in F-10
stable updates.
-- Rex
2:05 p.m.
Rex Dieter wrote:
Since amarok-2.0.x has issues with qt-4.5.1, and 2.1 final will be
landing soon, I got amarok upstream blessing for us to pursue and test
some amarok-2.1 builds for updates(testing) purposes.
So, these will be landing in kde-redhat/testing asap, and in fedora
updates-testing over the next week or so.
Oh, and to not leave F-9 users out, some fresh builds in kde-redhat/unstable
for them too.
F-9 users, do you have an opinion whether you'd rather have something like
this land in testing vs unstable? ie, for something like amarok2 that will
never come to F-9 official updates.
-- Rex
6:48 a.m.
On Monday 18 May 2009 20:08:41 Rex Dieter wrote:
Since amarok-2.0.x has issues with qt-4.5.1, and 2.1 final will be
landing soon, I got amarok upstream blessing for us to pursue and test
some amarok-2.1 builds for updates(testing) purposes.
So, these will be landing in kde-redhat/testing asap, and in fedora
updates-testing over the next week or so.
caveat: F-10 builds are currently lacking libgpod support, I've been in
contact with libgpod maintainer, and the required libgpod-0.7.0 will be
coming soon to F-10. This is a blocker for amarok-2.1 to land in F-10
stable updates.
Seems to be working quite well but Amarok is still skipping some tracks (and
yes, these track should be ok as it playes 2-4 seconds from it before skipping
and could be played alone).
I don't know how to get some important debug info... In attachment there's
debug (amarok --debug)... First track is ok, second skipped, next is OK.
Jaroslav
-- Rex
_______________________________________________
fedora-kde mailing list
fedora-kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
--
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik(a)redhat.com>
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 731 455 332
Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/
8:36 a.m.
2009/5/19 Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik(a)redhat.com>:
Seems to be working quite well but Amarok is still skipping some
tracks (and
yes, these track should be ok as it playes 2-4 seconds from it before skipping
and could be played alone).
I don't know how to get some important debug info... In attachment there's
debug (amarok --debug)... First track is ok, second skipped, next is OK.
Jaroslav
Amarok kept skipping tracks for me too. sometimes before it even
started playing. Other times after a number of seconds. Forget where I
read it but it is a known issue when the now playing applet it running
on the desktop. Running without the applet does seem to fix it for me
(I use shortcut keys anyway so no loss for me).
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary
and those who don't...
5464
days inactive
5465
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Jaroslav Reznik -
John5342 -
Rex Dieter