11:24 a.m.
On today's WG meeting we agree to send an additional paragraph to add to
the alpha[1] notes.
Here's a first crack at it.
---------------------------------8<--------------------------------------
Fedora Server Management Features
=================================
The Fedora Server product introduces new Server management features
aimed at making it easier to install discrete infrastructure services.
The Fedora Server WG will introduce two new technologies in Fedora to
handle this task, rolekit and cockpit.
Rolekit is a Role deployment and management toolkit that provides a
consistent interface to administrators to install and configure all
the packages needed to implement a specific server role.
Cockpit ... <stefw to contribute text here>
---------------------------------8<--------------------------------------
HTH,
Simo
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F21_Alpha_release_announcement#Fedora_21_S...
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
11:43 a.m.
On 09.09.2014 18:24, Simo Sorce wrote:
On today's WG meeting we agree to send an additional paragraph to
add to
the alpha[1] notes.
Here's a first crack at it.
---------------------------------8<--------------------------------------
Fedora Server Management Features
=================================
The Fedora Server product introduces new Server management features
aimed at making it easier to install discrete infrastructure services.
The Fedora Server WG will introduce two new technologies in Fedora to
handle this task, rolekit and cockpit.
Rolekit is a Role deployment and management toolkit that provides a
consistent interface to administrators to install and configure all
the packages needed to implement a specific server role.
"Cockpit is a user interface for configuring and monitoring your server
or servers. It is accessible remotely via a web browser."
[should we mention the TCP port here, to make it trivial to get started?]
Stef
7:21 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/09/2014 12:43 PM, Stef Walter wrote:
On 09.09.2014 18:24, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On today's WG meeting we agree to send an additional paragraph to
> add to the alpha[1] notes.
>
> Here's a first crack at it.
>
> ---------------------------------8<--------------------------------------
>
>
Fedora Server Management Features
> =================================
>
> The Fedora Server product introduces new Server management
> features aimed at making it easier to install discrete
> infrastructure services. The Fedora Server WG will introduce two
> new technologies in Fedora to handle this task, rolekit and
> cockpit. Rolekit is a Role deployment and management toolkit that
> provides a consistent interface to administrators to install and
> configure all the packages needed to implement a specific server
> role.
"Cockpit is a user interface for configuring and monitoring your
server or servers. It is accessible remotely via a web browser."
[should we mention the TCP port here, to make it trivial to get
started?]
Yes, I think we should.
"Cockpit is a user interface for configuring and monitoring your
servers. It is accessible remotely via a web browser on port 9090."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlQQQjoACgkQeiVVYja6o6PvcwCgojBA+OgZ+yyy3RII1S7LR0Oe
BqcAnRQYUtfHRp0P/DrHwy9JlFrNLG3/
=ws0G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
9:29 a.m.
Hello,
The Fedora Server WG will introduce two new technologies in Fedora
to
handle this task, rolekit and cockpit.
A nitpick: Should this say “Fedora Server
WG” or just “Fedora Server”? I‘d expect users not to care about the internal governance
structure of Fedora that much.
Mirek
9:30 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/2014 10:29 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
> The Fedora Server WG will introduce two new technologies in
> Fedora to handle this task, rolekit and cockpit.
A nitpick: Should this say “Fedora Server WG” or just “Fedora
Server”? I‘d expect users not to care about the internal
governance structure of Fedora that much.
Yes I agree. I didn't really notice the WG there, but you're right.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlQQYHQACgkQeiVVYja6o6NntgCbBmX2cBX73ejAxAzsn8cCiq8I
DDsAn3g7vpvzHMqNL+4Ntw6yLcmSDLAV
=QGiZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2:12 p.m.
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 10:30 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 09/10/2014 10:29 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Hello,
>> The Fedora Server WG will introduce two new technologies in
>> Fedora to handle this task, rolekit and cockpit.
> A nitpick: Should this say “Fedora Server WG” or just “Fedora
> Server”? I‘d expect users not to care about the internal
> governance structure of Fedora that much.
Yes I agree. I didn't really notice the WG there, but you're right.
It was clearly a Freudian slip, we had just finished the WG meeting :)
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
9:49 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/2014 03:12 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 10:30 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 09/10/2014 10:29 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> Hello,
>>> The Fedora Server WG will introduce two new technologies in
>>> Fedora to handle this task, rolekit and cockpit.
>> A nitpick: Should this say “Fedora Server WG” or just “Fedora
>> Server”? I‘d expect users not to care about the internal
>> governance structure of Fedora that much.
>
>
> Yes I agree. I didn't really notice the WG there, but you're
> right.
It was clearly a Freudian slip, we had just finished the WG meeting
:)
Simo.
I updated
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F21_Alpha_release_announcement#Fedora_21_S...
with this content (as well as a note about OpenLMI as well).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlQW/JYACgkQeiVVYja6o6Pu9gCfYSoCvMwXCZY5nPqTynu6wWJX
cBMAniFC7PsK72PXJzw4RgnN159dS85A
=xFHU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
6:03 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/2014 03:12 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 10:30 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On 09/10/2014 10:29 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>> The Fedora Server WG will introduce two new technologies in
>>>> Fedora to handle this task, rolekit and cockpit.
>>> A nitpick: Should this say “Fedora Server WG” or just “Fedora
>>> Server”? I‘d expect users not to care about the internal
>>> governance structure of Fedora that much.
>>
>>
>> Yes I agree. I didn't really notice the WG there, but you're
>> right.
>
> It was clearly a Freudian slip, we had just finished the WG meeting
> :)
>
> Simo.
>
I updated
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F21_Alpha_release_announcement#Fedora_21_S...
with this content (as well as a note about OpenLMI as well).
Thank you! I really like how you all guys stepped into and this time we're
going to have one of the best announcement ever and it's still just Alpha!
Jaroslav
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlQW/JYACgkQeiVVYja6o6Pu9gCfYSoCvMwXCZY5nPqTynu6wWJX
cBMAniFC7PsK72PXJzw4RgnN159dS85A
=xFHU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
server mailing list
server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server
3510
days inactive
3517
days old
server@lists.fedoraproject.org
7 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Jaroslav Reznik -
Miloslav Trmač -
Simo Sorce -
Stef Walter -
Stephen Gallagher