On 06/10/2015 06:05 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi Troy,
Well I'll suggest rather than coming out all guns blazing an email
that would have been more constructive would have been "Hey, I'd like
to see X better supported in F-23, this is what I believe the status
to be how can I help improve that?"
My apologies. I did not mean to come over that way, but in re-reading
what I wrote, it appears I did. So, starting over, but with your context.
Currently the only way I know of finding out the status, and work being
done on u-boot is from this mailling list and this wiki page.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/u-boot_syslinux
Is there another place with the status, or is it ok to ask here from
time to time?
So now that we're over the above this is our plans for both F-23,
and
how to move them back to F-22, open to suggestions and even better
patches to help out :-)
1) a means of more easily upgrade u-boot to a newer version in a
released image. We had most of this in place for F-22, we're actively
planning to push an improved 2015.04 release to F-22, the currently
pending blocker to that is the serial/HDMI rant you had above :-)
2) decent HDMI/usb console support with serial fall back, a bunch of
SoCs need patches to enable this, they need to be upstreamable
3) more work on distro defaults upstream. We're actively working with
upstream maintainers to enable this.
4) enabling work to ensure that new devices with upstream support
"just work" without our interaction
Believe me we're no lover of a serial only world but the fact is that
decent support for a lot of devices has only just landed and there is
two of us working on u-boot support in Fedora in 100% of our own time.
We're trying to support new devices as fully as we can but sometimes
other requirements come and roadtrain us. If you can assist with
patches believe me we're happy to accept them, and provide
constructive feedback if we feel there's issues. We hang out here on
this list and #fedora-arm
Peter
What can I do to help?
I'm a good packager, but the current package already looks good.
I can certainly test things. I've very good at debuging
code/configurations. My only limitation is that I currently only own a
Pi, beaglebone black, and pcduino3 Nano, with a Pi2 (hopefully) on the way.
Troy