Brendan Conoboy píše v Po 23. 04. 2012 v 09:03 -0700:
On 04/23/2012 08:06 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> the main problem no only in ARM land is that many software developers
> like to develop their own atomic ops implementations in their project
> instead of using some standard one eg. from GCC :-( I fight with this
> problem again and again on s390 ...
Are the fixes you're introducing s390 specific? Would love to reuse
existing solutions if they're not already in use.
I'm usually skipping such packages as there is a lot of other work on
s390, but when I dealt with them I've used either the gcc or C++
primitives or the atomic_ops library. The Pixie package seems to be on
my list of blocked by atomic ops, there should be more, but I haven't
analysed all failures yet.
Dan