On Sat, 8 Mar 2014 10:30:38 +0000, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>> In the case of the Pandaboard ES B3, there is no known kernel
able to
>> boot the board.
>>
>> In the case of the A6, the upstream kernel is believed to support the
>> board with a very recent version of uboot. However, recently one of our
>> contractors (*not* an expert on ARM kernel & boot issues) was unable to
>> find any Linux distribution that could boot on it.
>
> I think we need to make a distinction here between "kernel" and
> "distribution". If you can boot a kernel, you can boot any distro's
> rootfs
> (I'm completely ignoring installers here).
That's not entirely true, Fedora for example has a hard requirement on
a number of kernel features that will cause major issues if they're
not present.
That said I honestly don't believe it should be too hard for someone
with a hard debugger and a bit of know how to work out what is wrong
with the Fedora kernel on the PandaBoard devices to allow them to be
supported again in the main distribution kernel. The main problem
we've got is people with the know how don't have the interest and visa
versa. I personally just don't have the time and gave my HW debugger
away as a result.
The reason that we were considering providing some funding was in hope of
overcoming the lack-of-interest barrier.
Peter
--
Dr Peter Brett
http://peter-b.co.uk/