On 11/08/15 07:41, Rex Dieter wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> On 11/08/15 07:33, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Ed Greshko wrote:
>>
>>> Of course... As I said, the "enabled" repos....
>> OK, lastly, does yum or dnf see this updates too or not?
>>
>> Either way, something wierd is going on.
>>
> I did edit dnf.conf .... (which I sort of mentioned in my original
> message)
Please remove the exclude from dnf.conf and retest (it should not be needed
if in .repo files). I'm curious if it dnf behavior is the same as pk or not
wrt to exclude= in .repo files only.
[root@localhost dnf]# cat dnf.conf
[main]
gpgcheck=1
installonly_limit=3
clean_requirements_on_remove=true
[root@localhost dnf]#
root@localhost dnf]# dnf clean all
Cleaning repos: updates fedora
Cleaning up Everything
[root@localhost dnf]# dnf --refresh check-update
Fedora 23 - x86_64 - Updates 1.7 MB/s | 4.9 MB 00:02
Fedora 23 - x86_64 2.0 MB/s | 43 MB 00:21
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:34 ago on Sun Nov 8 07:45:02 2015.
[root@localhost dnf]#
--
In reality, some people should stick to running Windows and others should stay away from
computers altogether.