On 01/04/2019 20:03, Adam Williamson wrote:
So, here's the specific text I propose. At Basic we would change this
requirement:
"The boot menu for all supported installer and live images should
include an entry which causes both installation and the installed
system to use a generic, highly compatible video driver (such as
'vesa'). This mechanism should work correctly, launching the installer
or desktop and attempting to use the generic driver."
To read only:
"The boot menu for all release-blocking installer and live images
should include an entry which causes both installation and the
installed system to use a generic, highly compatible video driver (such
as 'vesa')."
i.e. remove the second sentence (and change 'supported' to 'release-
blocking' - that is a better form of words that should have been used
all along).
I'm not familiar with the in-crowd dialect here, but it seems strange
that 'release-blocking' is thought to be much the same as 'supported'.
Isn't the first bad and the second good ?
Perhaps it means 'images distributed before and after formal release' ?
John P