On 05/05/15 21:47, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 03:04:17PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> If that is the case, why are there no i686 builds? According to the
> Package Guidelines[1] "ExcludeArch should only be set when the
> architecture is not relevant for the package, the package is
> non-functional on the architecture, or the code does not compile
> cleanly for the architecture." Given that a lot of long-term
> packagers are working on Docker, I'd be surprised to learn that not
> building it on i686 is accidental.
Some combination of "not relevant" and "non-functional", in that
Docker
images as envisioned and provided by Docker upstream have no concept of
architecture and are always x86_64.
So what's happening with armv7hl then?
Paul.