On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 17:01 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On 12/06/2016 04:38 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I think we had general agreement around what we want to do here:
> have the Cloud Base Image become instead Fedora Server, but shipped
> as a cloud image and made available in cloud providers. What are
> the
> next steps to actually get there?
We discussed this and I believe the path forward is to have the Cloud
base image "housed" under the server WG. My understanding is that it
will take on a similar form to what it has now until we more hammer
our what "base runtime" is and then we'll add on top of base runtime
just what we need to satisfy cloud environments.
I have been identified as a stakeholder of this image and have an
action item to deliver some paragraph that indicates such to
sgallagh.
Dusty
Contact Releng to coordinate the logistics of such a change
Dennis