----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
To: server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 11:35:13 AM
Subject: Re: Fedora 23 Server: Fate of i686?
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:58:13PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> Some combination of "not relevant" and
"non-functional", in that Docker
> >> images as envisioned and provided by Docker upstream have no concept of
> >> architecture and are always x86_64.
> > I'm not sayin' that that's _good_, just explaining the background.
> I'd say it's good. Just because you can build everything for every
> architecture doesn't mean you _should_. People seem to ignore the
> value of focus sometimes.
Absolutely.
*That* said, if Fedora Server wanted to deliver roles via Docker
containers, I presume that those containers would be distributed from
Fedora infrastructure in some way, rather than pulled from the wild
west of the upstream Docker Hub. And we could make that work for
multiple architectures.
Actually, the way I had envisioned it involved creating containers from Dockerfiles
directly (so we can take advantage of the latest updates at the time of creation and so
that they can be generated without access to an external network, so long as they have
access to dnf). So I suppose with this in mind, we probably could support these containers
in Fedora Server on each of the available architectures, provided someone is willing to
build docker for i686.