Thanks, Kevin, for pointing this out. I was thinking the same thing, but I didn't know
if I should mention it, because like you said naming things is hard. I'm in agreement
with Peter's reply that it would be best not to change it from DVD until we have a
better 3 letter combination.
Steve
On Monday, July 17, 2023 12:24 PM (-04:00), Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 04:34:30PM +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
> Again, a bit late but hopefully not too late and for everyone's convenience, a
brief summary of our last IRC meeting right here.
>
> For greater Details see:
>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/server-working-group/wg-minutes-2023/
Sorry I've not been at meetings of late... so busy. ;(
> 1.
> As it looks at the moment the committee has accepted and is planning with a
presentation: Fedora Server Edition – Quo Vadis? Unfortunately a workshop about Server in
virtual environment, that I proposed, too, didn’t make it.
Thats good!
> 2.
> WG agrees about to use automated testing using Samba AD as the server end (instead
of a native Windows server) and to keep the status of release criteria.
>
> Full compatibility with Windows Server remains the goal regardless of the testing
procedure. And an inability to connect to a real Microsoft AD server remains a release
blocking criterion, since that is (and remains) the most prominent domain controller in
the world
>
> 3.
> Regarding Fedora Server on (ARM) SBC, we’ll complete the current device
documentation draft with the devices nominated until now.
>
> 4.
> We want to replace the "DVD" in the naming of the installation media by
"STD".
I think that's an... unfortunate name, and we shouldn't use it. ;)
At least in the US it's an acronym often used for:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STD_(disambiguation)
I know naming things is hard and I understand why DVD doesn't make sense
anymore, but how about we just call it 'server install image' or 'server
image' ?
kevin