On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:54 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Sorry for sounding harsh, I was just a bit frustrated. So, let
me try
> again: if you have concerns about our ability to implement the Server
> tech specs within the current F21 timeframe, well, that's a thing. The
> Server WG actually has similar concerns, which is why it asked FESCo for
> a schedule modification recently, but that's not exactly how it came
> out.
>
>
My concerns in relationship to your document was if
Role deployment
Role service query
Role firewall configuration
Role functional requirements
were overly or underly ambitious for what could be met. I did not
communicate that well and I can understand the frustration as negative
nancies steal the life out of everything.
Aside from the last, they all come direct from the tech spec. The last
seems rather implied; a role that doesn't actually work isn't much use
to anyone. :)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net