-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2014 10:09 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2014-02-28 19:55 GMT+01:00 Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com
<mailto:sgallagh@redhat.com>>:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server/Technical_Specification
<snip>
What we need right now is a vote of the Server Working Group
membership whether we feel this document is in sufficiently good
shape to send to FESCo, who intends to use it to gauge estimates
for the Fedora 21 schedule.
+1.
Non-blocking comments regarding the role definition:
* "A mechanism to install optional components of a role after
deployment." Do we really need this? Could we do without this
complexity?
We need this. In the case of FreeIPA (for example) this allows us to
install the DNS server or the Winsync capabilities (among other things).
* The firewall configuration: the mechanism to open/close ports
shouldn't be a role-specific API; couldn't the role just provide a
firewalld service definition, and leave the enabling/disabling to
the standard firewalld mechanisms?
We need to figure out the actual implementation, yes. That's going to
require some actual design work.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlMUnKQACgkQeiVVYja6o6OGdgCgl/5v99CwSiLkPNk2602QIzUX
bQwAniLXsMK7EfxVr0XsiiucWbK6SN7K
=nAp1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----