Re: Evolution under Fedora Core release 0.94
by Brian C. Huffman
Neither LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 nor 2.2.5 is resolving all issues...This needs a
correct resolution.
Anyone have an idea what's actually happening?
Brian
fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:20:57 -0400, Jim Drabb wrote:
>
> > LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 evolution
>
> For me, that improves starting evolution a lot. Closing it, however, is
> still problematic.
>
> Julio
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>
--
20 years, 7 months
Fedora Core questions
by Nicholas Marsh
Is this the working name, or will the system always be known as Fedora Core? My vote, if it's worth anything, would be to drop the "Core" and just go with Fedora.
Also, will the red hat programs menu icon change since it is no longer Red Hat Linux?
Thanks.
nick marsh
nmarsh1(a)mac.com
20 years, 7 months
Nautilus in 94 doesn't do all-users
by George Farris
I have Nautilus 2.4.0 from the Nyquist apt-get repository on one machine
and when I go to applications-all-users:/// I see the menus that all
users get and can modify them.
Nautilus 2.4.0 from fedora .94 shows a blank screen, bug or missing
feature?
Any ideas?
--
George Farris farrisg(a)mala.bc.ca
Malaspina University-College - Cowichan Campus
20 years, 7 months
RAM requirements for NFS installation
by Pavel Rosenboim
Hi,
I installed the FC test2 over NFS (and VNC) on a machine with 128 MB
RAM. After partitioning stage I got a message saying that I don't have
enough RAM and swap must be activated immediately. Previously, I
installed taroon on the same machine and I didn't see such message. Is
this a bug or NFS/VNC combination requires more RAM?
Pavel.
20 years, 7 months
RHN
by ksm451＠juno.com
Icannot register my system at RHN,though i've got an account with RHN.Anytime I want to register through Update it fails.what might be the cause.
paul
________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
20 years, 7 months
Anyone seeing data corruption like bz#91932
by Michael K. Johnson
There's a bug showing apparant data corruption on IDE:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91932
It seems to be a unique report but I'd like to make sure.
Ignore the lines like:
hda: task_no_data_intr: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError }
hda: task_no_data_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
They are understood to be informational and not related to the
reported data corruption.
It's possible that the reporter of #91932 has hardware that is
marginal and has a bug that earlier kernels don't exercise, but
it's also possible that there is a generic data corruption problem
on IDE.
So, we'd like to ask that anyone else seeing data corruption
running Bonnie++ (or anything else, for that matter) please
report.
Thanks,
michaelkjohnson
"He that composes himself is wiser than he that composes a book."
Linux Application Development -- Ben Franklin
http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad/
20 years, 7 months
can't install on asus a7n8x
by Per Bothner
I rather optimistically bought an Asus a7n8x Deluxe
motherboard (with the Nvidia nForce2 chipset), along with
an Athlon XP 2600+, and tried to install Severn2. Multiple
times. Each time it got partway into installing packages and
then a kernel panic or freeze.
I had hoped it would work, since I read (mis-read?) that
the a7n8x runs on RH 9 without patches. But that doesn't
seem to be the case either - each time I try to do a
gcc boostrap (on a different partition than the one I
tried to install Severn2 on), gcc fails in a different way.
My guess is some disk-related problem, such as DMA.
(I have moved a jumper to disable SATA, so the kernel would
not timeout for the non-existent drives.) Any suggestions?
[This is a re-port. The previous posting has spent almost
to 24 hours awaiting "moderator approval", so I decided I
needed to subscribe.]
--
--Per Bothner
per(a)bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/
20 years, 7 months
searching for packages w/yum
by Lorenzo Prince
Hi all,
Is there a yum equivalent to apt-cache search Msearcg-term>
The manpage doesn't seem to show a way to do this. If this isn't available, is it in the works for the future? Should
I file a request w/ RH or the yum developers to add such a feature?
Prince
20 years, 7 months
Re: stupid apt problem
by Jef Spaleta
Daniel Wittenberg wrote:
> I know this is probably something stupid...or is it easier to download
> the .iso's and do it that way? It seemed from the webpage the "proper"
> way to do it was via apt so I thought I'd try.
Which webpage gave you that impression? I would dare say that the idea
that apt is the preferred upgrade method at this time is way off the
mark. Unless something significant has changed....anaconda, the
installer on the iso image, was/is/will be the upgrade method and
got/gets/will get the testing priority during the test phase...and thus
will be the expected upgrade path when upgrading from official release
to official release. As far as I can tell....apt and yum can be used to
upgrade from official release to official release but its a worksforme
kind of situation. The expectation I'm working under is that anaconda is
the expected upgrade path and anaconda is what testers need to test as a
priority.
-jef"i'd love to be wrong..."spaleta
20 years, 7 months
2.6test5 lockup at ps2 mice
by Neal D. Becker
I am trying 2.6test5 kernel on beta2. It locks solid at the kernel startup,
at a line saying something about ps2 mice.
20 years, 7 months
