Bluetooth enable in fc11?
by Bill Davidsen
I have loaded all the "bluez*" stuff, dmesg shows no errors in the bluetooth
lines, is there some tool google didn't show to duplicate the Windows behavior
of showing BT devices nearby and offering to connect to them. I really would
like to use a BT headset, and maybe use BT for a printer, but there just doesn't
seem to be any such app, so I assume I have to install yet more packages.
Under Windows the system see headsets, cell phones, a printer, and an "other
device" which is unidentified. I would think this would be common enough to work
out of the box, but it doesn't even work under fc10.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen(a)tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
14 years, 11 months
Some success with dahdi in F11
by Bruno Wolff III
Since I haven't seen addon rpms for dahdi or zaptel for F11 yet I tried
playing with it myself basing off a spec file proposed for rpmfusion.
Dahdi 2.1.0.4 didn't build in a way that looks like that branch hasn't been
changed to work with the 2.6.29 kernel. I figured that meant it was likely
that zaptel wouldn't either and didn't pursue that. I was able to get
Dahdi 2.2.0.0-rc4 to build most of its stuff. One driver I didn't use
seem to be having build problems related to a name change. I was able to
tweak the spec file to not fail because of this, but I think there is a
problem with Digium's build process.
Unfortunately only having dahdi limited me to asterisk (callweaver still
only works with the older zaptel drivers). But I was able to get a simple
test case working with my analog TDM hardware.
14 years, 11 months
httpd Doesn't Seem To Work In Fedora 11
by Robert L Cochran
This morning I wanted to play with Fedora 11's httpd and get some
content up. I last worked with the web server on 04/11 according to the
access logs. I was successful at that time and was able to bring up the
expected "test page".
Today, when I brought up Firefox, it gave me am "unable to connect"
message for both localhost and the fully qualified server hostname
defined in httpd.conf. I checked my firewall. Aha! httpd wasn't trusted.
I checked it off as a trusted service and restarted. Still no test page
content. I recalled some SELinux error messages involving httpd, so I
disabled SELinux, rebooted the system, and tried to get the test page
again. Nothing. Here is what is in /var/log/httpd:
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 2009-04-19 12:19 access_log
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1641 2009-04-11 19:32 access_log-20090419
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 17885 2009-05-23 09:11 error_log
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 19799 2009-04-26 09:49 error_log-20090426
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 16467 2009-05-03 10:47 error_log-20090503
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 17300 2009-05-10 10:45 error_log-20090510
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 13968 2009-05-17 09:06 error_log-20090517
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 2009-04-11 17:29 ssl_access_log
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 4773 2009-05-23 09:11 ssl_error_log
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 5217 2009-04-26 08:47 ssl_error_log-20090426
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 4329 2009-05-03 09:39 ssl_error_log-20090503
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 4551 2009-05-10 09:21 ssl_error_log-20090510
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 3663 2009-05-17 09:00 ssl_error_log-20090517
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 2009-04-11 17:29 ssl_request_log
Here is the last successful request, listed in access_log-20090419:
192.168.1.46 - - [11/Apr/2009:17:31:11 -0400] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 403 3918
"-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3)
Gecko/20090327 Fedora/3.1-0.11.beta3.fc11 Firefox/3.1b3"
192.168.1.46 - - [11/Apr/2009:17:31:11 -0400] "GET /icons/apache_pb2.gif
HTTP/1.1" 200 1797 "http://deafeng3.signtype.info/" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11;
U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3) Gecko/20090327
Fedora/3.1-0.11.beta3.fc11 Firefox/3.1b3"
192.168.1.46 - - [11/Apr/2009:17:31:11 -0400] "GET /icons/poweredby.png
HTTP/1.1" 200 3034 "http://deafeng3.signtype.info/" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11;
U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3) Gecko/20090327
Fedora/3.1-0.11.beta3.fc11 Firefox/3.1b3"
192.168.1.46 - - [11/Apr/2009:17:31:11 -0400] "GET /favicon.ico
HTTP/1.1" 404 297 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
rv:1.9.1b3) Gecko/20090327 Fedora/3.1-0.11.beta3.fc11 Firefox/3.1b3"
192.168.1.46 - - [11/Apr/2009:17:31:14 -0400] "GET /favicon.ico
HTTP/1.1" 404 297 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
rv:1.9.1b3) Gecko/20090327 Fedora/3.1-0.11.beta3.fc11 Firefox/3.1b3"
192.168.1.46 - - [11/Apr/2009:18:24:51 -0400] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 403 3918
"-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3)
Gecko/20090327 Fedora/3.1-0.11.beta3.fc11 Firefox/3.1b3"
192.168.1.46 - - [11/Apr/2009:18:24:55 -0400] "GET /favicon.ico
HTTP/1.1" 404 297 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
rv:1.9.1b3) Gecko/20090327 Fedora/3.1-0.11.beta3.fc11 Firefox/3.1b3"
192.168.1.46 - - [11/Apr/2009:19:32:41 -0400] "GET /favicon.ico
HTTP/1.1" 404 297 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
rv:1.9.1b3) Gecko/20090327 Fedora/3.1-0.11.beta3.fc11 Firefox/3.1b3"
Here are the last few lines of the error_log:
[Sat May 23 09:10:01 2009] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down
[Sat May 23 09:11:09 2009] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper:
/usr/sbin/suexec)
[Sat May 23 09:11:09 2009] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest
authentication ...
[Sat May 23 09:11:09 2009] [notice] Digest: done
[Sat May 23 09:11:09 2009] [notice] mod_python: Creating 4 session
mutexes based on 256 max processes and 0 max threads.
[Sat May 23 09:11:09 2009] [notice] mod_python: using mutex_directory /tmp
[Sat May 23 09:11:10 2009] [notice] Apache/2.2.11 (Unix) DAV/2
mod_auth_pgsql/2.0.3 PHP/5.2.9 mod_python/3.3.1 Python/2.6
mod_ssl/2.2.11 OpenSSL/0.9.8k-fips mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.0
configured -- resuming normal operations
Note: the ip address above for 192.168.1.46 is a wired connection. I
also use a wireless connection a lot, with a different IP address, but
that shouldn't matter, right? See wlan0:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:21:70:C1:AA:79
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Memory:f6fe0000-f7000000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:28 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:28 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:2396 (2.3 KiB) TX bytes:2396 (2.3 KiB)
virbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:DC:6C:10:F7:2A
inet addr:192.168.122.1 Bcast:192.168.122.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::fcdc:6cff:fe10:f72a/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:31 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:6087 (5.9 KiB)
wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:21:6A:0C:7D:FE
inet addr:192.168.1.48 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::221:6aff:fe0c:7dfe/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:150 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:120 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:29903 (29.2 KiB) TX bytes:17286 (16.8 KiB)
wmaster0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr
00-21-6A-0C-7D-FE-60-BA-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
My latest kernel:
[rlc@deafeng3 ~]$ uname -a
Linux deafeng3.signtype.info 2.6.29.3-155.fc11.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed May 20
17:43:16 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Any suggestions?
Bob
14 years, 11 months
Fedora 11 system-config-users failure
by James J Catchpole
When I use system-config-users I get the following failure. Note that
the GUI Interface also fails but it just disappears with no indication
of what is wrong; I am assuming that the underlying system-config-users
failure is causing that failure as well.
[root@JJC-T60 ~]# system-config-users
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/system-config-users/system-config-users.py", line
46, in <module>
mainWindow.mainWindow()
File "/usr/share/system-config-users/mainWindow.py", line 311, in
__init__
self.refresh()
File "/usr/share/system-config-users/mainWindow.py", line 517, in refresh
self.populate_lists()
File "/usr/share/system-config-users/mainWindow.py", line 616, in
populate_lists
self.populate_user_list()
File "/usr/share/system-config-users/mainWindow.py", line 574, in
populate_user_list
self.userStore.set_value(iter, 1, uidNumber)
TypeError: value is of the wrong type for this column
[root@JJC-T60 ~]#
On 05/20/2009 03:55 AM, fedora-test-list-request(a)redhat.com wrote:
> Send fedora-test-list mailing list submissions to
> fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-test-list-request(a)redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-test-list-owner(a)redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-test-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. flash in Fedora 11 working,, Thanks to Christopher A.
> Williams (Leslie Satenstein)
> 2. Re: One week slip of Fedora 11 Release (David)
> 3. Re: every so often, screen just goes black (Robert P. J. Day)
> 4. Re: every so often, screen just goes black (Adam Williamson)
> 5. Re: repo issue (Adrin Jalali)
> 6. Firefox crash when visiting Planet Fedora (Rahul Sundaram)
> 7. Re: Firefox crash when visiting Planet Fedora (Antonio M)
> 8. Re: Firefox crash when visiting Planet Fedora (Ralf Corsepius)
> 9. Re: Firefox crash when visiting Planet Fedora (kashyap)
> 10. Re: Firefox crash when visiting Planet Fedora (omar naas)
> 11. Re: Firefox crash when visiting Planet Fedora (Gireesh Sreekantan)
> 12. Re: Firefox crash when visiting Planet Fedora (Adam Pribyl)
> 13. Re: Firefox crash when visiting Planet Fedora (Paul Black)
> 14. Re: Preupgrade problem (Adam Pribyl)
> 15. Re: Firefox crash when visiting Planet Fedora (omar naas)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 19:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Leslie Satenstein<lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com>
> Subject: flash in Fedora 11 working,, Thanks to Christopher A.
> Williams
> To: Fedora-Test_list redhat<fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com>
> Message-ID:<844111.64471.qm(a)web110714.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
>
> p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
>
> On Tuesday 19 May 2009 14:56:53 Christopher A. Williams wrote some instructions:
>
>
>
>
>> Here's how I did it:
>>
>> 1) Download the latest 64-bit flash plugin from:
>> http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
>>
>> Note that this is still in RC status...
>>
>> 2) Unpack the .tar.gz file and place a copy of the .so file in:
>> /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins (do this as root)
>>
>> 3) As root, run the command:
>> mozilla-plugin-config -i -g -v
>>
>> You're finished!
>>
>> Flash should then show up in Firefox about:plugins
>>
>> Works like a champ on all of my 64-bit F11 systems.
>>
> And on my system too.
>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Chris
>>
> The following worked for me with the fedora11 beta (which is oozing into being non-beta)
>
> 1) I downloaded the flash and extracted it to my desktop. (I wanted to keep a copy)
> 2) I sudo'ed su (to root)
> 3) I switched to my Desktop
> 4) cp libflashplayer.so /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins
> 5) mozilla-plugin-config -i -g -v
> ------------------
>
> Regards
> Mr. Leslie
> Leslie Satenstein
>
> voice: 514-369-1685
> mailto:lsatenstein@yahoo.com
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090519/907...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 22:47:47 -0400
> From: David<dgboles(a)comcast.net>
> Subject: Re: One week slip of Fedora 11 Release
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> <fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com>
> Message-ID:<4A136F53.3010906(a)comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On 5/19/2009 8:26 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 19:58 -0400, David wrote:
>>
>>> What does this do to the 'restart' of Rawhide please?
>>>
>> The restart of rawhide will happen when we're done with Fedora 11
>> development.
>>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
14 years, 11 months
key issues
by Joel Rees
Installed release candidate on an ancient clamshell iBook about a
month or so back. Runs very nicely (Netbeans!). Only complaint is
that we haven't been able to make any progress on an issue where the
Fedora installer overwrites the Mac OS 9 disk drivers, which I wish I
had more time to help with.
Last night, about midnight here in Japan, I started a yum update to
be running while I slept. It completed sometime before five a.m.
Just for fun, I decided to check again about 9:00 a.m., and it shows
about 200M of new stuff. So I started another update, and after the
download, I get a prompt for a key:
--------------------------
warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: NOKEY,
key ID d22e77f2
updates/
gpgkey
| 1.6 kB 00:00
Importing GPG key 0xD22E77F2 "Fedora (11) <fedora(a)fedoraproject.org>"
from /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-ppc
Is this ok [y/N]:
--------------------------
I see from the wiki <https://fedoraproject.org/keys> that this is the
key for Fedora 11 test. I was surprised that I would not have already
installed the key.
I also saw some posts in the archives here about the key not yet
being in use as recently as a couple of weeks back, I think it was.
So, is this the right key, and is it okay to depend on it yet?
Joel Rees
14 years, 11 months
what package will give me /lib/ld-linux.so.2 on x86_64?
by Robert P. J. Day
i have a prebuilt cross-compile toolchain which, when i try to
compile a simple "hi, world", complains thusly:
/bin/bash:
prebuilt/linux-x86/toolchain/arm-eabi-4.2.1/bin/arm-eabi-gcc:
/lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory
since i'm running f11 x86_64, which compat package would i install
to get that 32-bit linker? thanks.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
14 years, 11 months
rawhide report: 20090523 changes
by Fedora compose checker
Compose started at Sat May 23 06:15:04 UTC 2009
Updated Packages:
alsa-utils-1.0.20-3.fc11
------------------------
* Fri May 15 2009 Jaroslav Kysela <jkysela(a)redhat.com> 1.0.20-3
- fixed Headphone Volume issue (bz#500956)
* Mon May 11 2009 Jaroslav Kysela <jkysela(a)redhat.com> 1.0.20-1
- updated to 1.0.20 final
- updated alsa-info.sh script to 0.4.56
* Mon May 11 2009 Jaroslav Kysela <jkysela(a)redhat.com> 1.0.20-2
- fix build (update sources file)
coccinelle-0.1.8-1.fc11.3
-------------------------
* Fri May 22 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> - 0.1.8-1.fc11.3
- New upstream version 0.1.8.
- Include patch from Debian to fix CVE-2009-1753 (RHBZ#502174).
- Segfaults on PPC64, so added to ExcludeArch.
generic-release-11-1
--------------------
* Wed May 20 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> - 11-1
- resync with fedora-release package
glibc-2.10.1-2
--------------
* Fri May 22 2009 Jakub Jelinek <jakub(a)redhat.com> 2.10.1-2
- fix accept4 on architectures other than i?86/x86_64
- robustify nscd client code during server GC
- fix up nscd segfaults during daemon shutdown
- fix memchr on ia64 (BZ#10162)
- replace the Sun RPC license with the BSD license, with the explicit
permission of Sun Microsystems
- fix up powerpc long double errno reporting
ibus-chewing-1.0.10.20090523-2.fc11
-----------------------------------
* Fri May 22 2009 - Ding-Yi Chen <dchen at redhat.com> - 1.0.10.20090522-1
- Now the 1st down key brings the longest possible phrases.
The 2nd down key brings the 2nd longest possible phrases from the back,
unlike the previous versions where the cursor stays in the head of longest phrase.
- Add force lowercase in English mode option.
- Fix double free issue when destroy ibus-chewing.
- Hide ibus-chewing-panel when ibus-chewing is focus-out
* Fri May 22 2009 Ding-Yi Chen <dchen at redhat.com> - 1.0.10.20090523-1
- Applied Lubomir Rintel's patch
* Fri May 22 2009 Ding-Yi Chen <dchen at redhat.com> - 1.0.10.20090523-2
- Add back the export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source`
* Mon May 11 2009 Ding-Yi Chen <dchen at redhat.com> - 1.0.9.20090508-1
Now commit is forced when switch of ibus-chewing or current application loses focus.
- New ibus-chewing.png is contribute by WM.
- input-keyboard.png is no longer needed and removed.
- ibus-engine-chewing -v option now need an integer as verbose level.
- ibus-chewing.schemas is now generated.
- Fix some CMake modules bugs.
* Tue Apr 28 2009 Ding-Yi Chen <dchen at redhat.com> - 1.0.8.20090428-1
Fix the errors which Funda Wang as pointing out:
- Move src/chewing.xml.in to data/
- Fixed some typo in next_version targets.
- Remove GConf2 package requirement, while add gconftool-2 requirement.
libchewing-0.3.2-10.fc11
------------------------
* Wed May 20 2009 Ding-Yi Chen <dchen at redhat dot com> - 0.3.2-10
- Need autoreconf to make changes in Makefile.am effective.
* Mon May 18 2009 Ding-Yi Chen <dchen at redhat dot com> - 0.3.2-9
- Possible Fix of Bug 501220 - RFE: edit last preedit character from end of line
Chewing upstream does not handle if phrase choice rearward is enabled.
libdrm-2.4.6-7.fc11
-------------------
* Tue May 19 2009 Kristian Høgsberg <krh(a)redhat.com> - 2.4.6-7
- Add patch to limit cachable object size (#498131).
squirrelmail-1.4.19-1.fc11
--------------------------
* Fri May 22 2009 Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink(a)redhat.com> - 1.4.19-1
- updated to 1.4.19
- fixes CVE-2009-1579, CVE-2009-1580, CVE-2009-1581
* Tue May 19 2009 Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink(a)redhat.com> - 1.4.18-2
- fix undefined variable aSpamIds (#501260)
* Tue May 12 2009 Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink(a)redhat.com> - 1.4.18-1
- updated to 1.4.18
transmission-1.53-1.fc11
------------------------
* Fri May 22 2009 Denis Leroy <denis(a)poolshark.org> - 1.53-1
- Update to upstream 1.53
- Security fix CVE-2009-1757 (#500278)
* Tue Apr 28 2009 Denis Leroy <denis(a)poolshark.org> - 1.52-1
- Update to upstream 1.52
- XDG Download patch upstreamed
- Added patch to make full allocation by default
xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.7.0-6.fc11
-------------------------------
* Wed May 20 2009 <krh(a)madara.bos.redhat.com> - 2.7.0-6
- Add intel-2.7-dont-gtt-map-big-objects.patch to avoid mapping big
gem objects through the GTT (#498131).
* Thu May 07 2009 Adam Jackson <ajax(a)redhat.com> 2.7.0-5
- Update intel-gpu-tools
Summary:
Added Packages: 0
Removed Packages: 0
Modified Packages: 10
Broken deps for ppc64
----------------------------------------------------------
cabal2spec-0.12-1.fc11.noarch requires ghc > 0:6.10.1-7
14 years, 11 months
Two subscription confirmation requests?
by Joel Rees
Do we need a heads-up for this?
I just signed on via an e-mail request, but I got two confirmation
request replies.
I'm a little concerned that there may be a man-in-the-middle attack
going on.
I'd normally shrug my shoulders and think, administration issues, but
there's another question I have, which I'll post separately.
Headers look almost identical, the primary difference being that one
of (what should be) RedHat's internal routing machines is different
between the two. I'll keep the messages so I can copy the source to
an admin if somebody wants to check.
Joel Rees
14 years, 11 months
Re: Flash instructions updated
by Antonio Olivares
> And with that, and no disrespect intended to anyone
> present, this thread has now reached its useful conclusion.
> :-) Back to testing!
>
> --
This would depend now on other users and how their beliefs hold. I came a bit strong here, but I have realized that the instructions were meant for a wiki and ``not to be set in stone'' so I can put my arguments to rest and agree with Adam and Kevin on this. But also can come back and support David with his arguments as well. So I'll be quiet but I'll be ready in case someone comes back and tells me that I am wrong, because we all like to be right!
Regards,
Antonio
14 years, 11 months
