Please pardon my still learning questions as I have never been involved with a software project that involved a large number of people before.
I have seen various e'mails on this list that mentioned Pull Requests and Tickets. I was curious about these things and so I started reading about them.
From what I read about Pull Requests, they are used by developers to essentially submit something for review, inclusion in a build or compose. Such submissions could be for fedora and accompanying applications or for fedora infrastructure. To use Pull Requests you have to get set up with GitHub and clone the fedora stuff on your PC. Then you pick something to work on. When you're at a point where you what to at least get some comments on what you've done, you submit a Pull Request. If I have this wrong or incomplete please point me to where I should read more.
Then I got curious about infrastructure; so I started reading about fedora infrastructure. From what I've read the infrastructure term is used to refer to the servers, networks, and websites that all the fedora teams use to accomplish their fedora related work. I also thought this might include the various build, compose, test procedures, and test software used, but that wasn't clear to me. If I have this wrong or incomplete please point me to where I should read more.
Then I read some about Tickets. From what I read, Tickets are the vehicle used for report infrastructure bugs, problems or suggestions for enhancement. From the e'mails I have seen on this list they also seem to be used by teams to act as reminders for team members to do things. To write or edit a Ticket Pagure seems to be used. I browsed the projects in Pagure and you really need to know exactly which project to use before you go there. If I have this wrong or incomplete please point me to where I should read more.
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 01:33:48PM -0500, pmkellly@frontier.com wrote:
applications or for fedora infrastructure. To use Pull Requests you have to get set up with GitHub and clone the fedora stuff on your PC. Then you pick something to work on. When you're at a point where you what to at least get some comments on what you've done, you submit a Pull Request. If I have this wrong or incomplete please point me to where I should read more.
That's essentially right, although the workflow is not limited to GitHub. It's also used by Pagure (used by Fedora at https://pagure.io and https://src.fedoraproject.org) and GitLab (used for example by upstream GNOME).
Then I got curious about infrastructure; so I started reading about fedora infrastructure. From what I've read the infrastructure term is used to refer to the servers, networks, and websites that all the fedora teams use to accomplish their fedora related work. I also thought this might include the various build, compose, test procedures, and test software used, but that wasn't clear to me. If I have this wrong or incomplete please point me to where I should read more.
This is basically right too, although in Fedora it's complicated because historically some bits of this were owned by Infrastructure and others by Release Engineering. We're working on consolidating that all into one team.
Then I read some about Tickets. From what I read, Tickets are the vehicle used for report infrastructure bugs, problems or suggestions for enhancement. From the e'mails I have seen on this list they also seem to be used by teams to act as reminders for team members to do things. To write or edit a Ticket Pagure seems to be used. I browsed the projects in Pagure and you really need to know exactly which project to use before you go there. If I have this wrong or incomplete please point me to where I should read more.
Yes, this is right too. Sorry -- it's a big project and so it's hard to avoid there being lots of different parts.
On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 17:02 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
Then I read some about Tickets. From what I read, Tickets are the
vehicle used for report infrastructure bugs, problems or suggestions for enhancement. From the e'mails I have seen on this list they also seem to be used by teams to act as reminders for team members to do things. To write or edit a Ticket Pagure seems to be used. I browsed the projects in Pagure and you really need to know exactly which project to use before you go there. If I have this wrong or incomplete please point me to where I should read more.
Yes, this is right too. Sorry -- it's a big project and so it's hard to avoid there being lots of different parts.
It's worth noting that, just like 'pull request', 'issue' or 'ticket' is a generic concept you will encounter in many different systems. Both Pagure and Github (and Gitlab and many others) have an 'issue' concept that works similarly. The logic is not "I need to file an issue so I must go to Pagure", but "I need to file an issue against project (FOO) so I must go to the tracker project (FOO) uses, whatever that is".