Although had been pointed out before this bug still exists in final version!!! 1) Installing FC4 64 with reiserfs system the system fails to boot since it' can't mount the root fs!!! 2) I own an AMD 64bit 3200+ the gnome applet that show the cpu speed complains that it can not manage the cpu speed so my cpu is stack at 2Ghz even when cpu time is 0%. Cool and quiet which was WORKING on fc4 rc3 use to slow down my cpu at 800Mhz when cpu load was low and the gnome applet worked fine! 3) XMMS is missing! Nice... who needs the famous xmms?? 4) my favorite editor jed is missing... nice Now I have to turn to vi??? and more to come as I look in to it the following days!!! Anyway it still mych better then FC3!!! Nice job, thainks !
Γώρκας Δημήτριος wrote:
Although had been pointed out before this bug still exists in final version!!!
- Installing FC4 64 with reiserfs system the system fails to boot
since it' can't mount the root fs!!!
Reiserfs is not support in this release. only ext3
- XMMS is missing! Nice... who needs the famous xmms??
Rythmbox is the default player. Xmms is a gtk1 application and does not use the gstreamer framework. It is available in Fedora Extras
#yum install xmms
- my favorite editor jed is missing... nice Now I have to turn to vi???
You have nano or emacs too. It would a good idea to step up to maintain Joe in Fedora Extras if you are interested in it http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras
and more to come as I look in to it the following days!!! Anyway it still mych better then FC3!!! Nice job, thainks !
Glad you like it
regards Rahul
Hi
- my favorite editor jed is missing... nice Now I have to turn to vi???
Just found out that Jed is in there too
http://fedoraproject.org/extras/4/i386/repodata/repoview/jed-0-0.99.16-10.ht...
#yum install jed
regards Rahul
On 6/14/05, Rahul Sundaram sundaram@redhat.com wrote:
You have nano or emacs too. It would a good idea to step up to maintain Joe in Fedora Extras if you are interested in it http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras
Excuse me? emacs-21.4-5.i386.rpm emacs-leim-21.4-5.i386.rpm emacs-common-21.4-5.i386.rpm emacs-nox-21.4-5.i386.rpm emacs-el-21.4-5.i386.rpm emacspeak-21.0-2.i386.rpm
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On 6/14/05, Rahul Sundaram sundaram@redhat.com wrote:
You have nano or emacs too. It would a good idea to step up to maintain Joe in Fedora Extras if you are interested in it http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras
Excuse me? emacs-21.4-5.i386.rpm emacs-leim-21.4-5.i386.rpm emacs-common-21.4-5.i386.rpm emacs-nox-21.4-5.i386.rpm emacs-el-21.4-5.i386.rpm emacspeak-21.0-2.i386.rpm
My point exactly, that the user doesnt have to use vi and can use emacs since it already exists in core. In a followup I also confirmed that Jed is available from Fedora Extras
regards Rahul
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 09:30, Γώρκας Δημήτριος wrote:
- XMMS is missing! Nice... who needs the famous xmms??
It is in extras now: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/4/i386/xmms-1.2.10...
- my favorite editor jed is missing... nice Now I have to turn to vi???
So is jed: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/4/i386/jed-0.99.16...
I am not at my FC4 machine now, but I think extras is enabled by default, so you should be able to do:
yum install xmms jed
Lars
tir, 14 06 2005 kl. 10:30 +0300, skrev Γώρκας Δημήτριος:
Although had been pointed out before this bug still exists in final version!!!
- Installing FC4 64 with reiserfs system the system fails to boot since
it' can't mount the root fs!!!
I it not a SELinux problem here? Reaiser FS is not kompatible with SELinux.
- I own an AMD 64bit 3200+ the gnome applet that show the cpu speed
complains that it can not manage the cpu speed so my cpu is stack at 2Ghz even when cpu time is 0%. Cool and quiet which was WORKING on fc4 rc3 use to slow down my cpu at 800Mhz when cpu load was low and the gnome applet worked fine!
I too have problem with the Network monitor applet in the AMD 64 system.
- XMMS is missing! Nice... who needs the famous xmms??
- my favorite editor jed is missing... nice Now I have to turn to vi???
and more to come as I look in to it the following days!!! Anyway it still mych better then FC3!!! Nice job, thainks !
Its by far the best Fedora release. Besides the syslinux install issue, its great!
/Bjorn
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 12:19 +0200, Bjorn Andersen wrote:
tir, 14 06 2005 kl. 10:30 +0300, skrev Γώρκας Δημήτριος:
Although had been pointed out before this bug still exists in final version!!!
- Installing FC4 64 with reiserfs system the system fails to boot since
it' can't mount the root fs!!!
I it not a SELinux problem here? Reaiser FS is not kompatible with SELinux.
That should have been addressed (i.e. reiserfs xattr support has allegedly been fixed upstream to work properly with SELinux), but others have also reported breakage with reiserfs in FC4. Whether or not it is SELinux-related, I'm not sure.
Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 12:19 +0200, Bjorn Andersen wrote:
tir, 14 06 2005 kl. 10:30 +0300, skrev Γώρκας Δημήτριος:
Although had been pointed out before this bug still exists in final version!!!
- Installing FC4 64 with reiserfs system the system fails to boot since
it' can't mount the root fs!!!
I it not a SELinux problem here? Reaiser FS is not kompatible with SELinux.
That should have been addressed (i.e. reiserfs xattr support has allegedly been fixed upstream to work properly with SELinux), but others have also reported breakage with reiserfs in FC4. Whether or not it is SELinux-related, I'm not sure.
Well , XFS is compatible with selinux and same problem occurs if /boot is a XFS filesystem (grub segfaults during setup). If you use ext3 for /boot , you can use XFS (and probably reiser) for the other partitions , as long as you dont use mount-by-label. Manually removing all label references on my fstab and grub.conf made it work perfectly (/boot ext3 , / and /home xfs. /home was the only partition that was from a previous install and wasnt formatted).
-- Pedro Macedo
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Pedro Fernandes Macedo wrote:
Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 12:19 +0200, Bjorn Andersen wrote:
tir, 14 06 2005 kl. 10:30 +0300, skrev ÎÏÏÎºÎ±Ï ÎημήÏÏιοÏ:
Although had been pointed out before this bug still exists in final version!!!
- Installing FC4 64 with reiserfs system the system fails to boot since
it' can't mount the root fs!!!
I it not a SELinux problem here? Reaiser FS is not kompatible with SELinux.
That should have been addressed (i.e. reiserfs xattr support has allegedly been fixed upstream to work properly with SELinux), but others have also reported breakage with reiserfs in FC4. Whether or not it is SELinux-related, I'm not sure.
Well , XFS is compatible with selinux and same problem occurs if /boot is a XFS filesystem (grub segfaults during setup). If you use ext3 for /boot , you can use XFS (and probably reiser) for the other partitions , as long as you dont use mount-by-label. Manually removing all label references on my fstab and grub.conf made it work perfectly (/boot ext3 , / and /home xfs. /home was the only partition that was from a previous install and wasnt formatted).
These are all well known issues with fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=159123 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=159188 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156460
-Dan
-
Bjorn Andersen -
Dan Hollis -
Gregory Maxwell -
James Black -
Lars E. Pettersson -
Pedro Fernandes Macedo -
Rahul Sundaram -
Stephen Smalley