3:34 p.m.
If this is policy, and not a mistake, I shall soon be unsubscribing.
regards, tom lane
3:49 p.m.
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 16:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
If this is policy, and not a mistake, I shall soon be unsubscribing.
Well, because this is the mailing list of the QA team, and we use the
trac tickets to organize our work.
It's not very hard to filter them out if you don't want them.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
3:53 p.m.
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 13:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 16:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> If this is policy, and not a mistake, I shall soon be unsubscribing.
Well, because this is the mailing list of the QA team, and we use the
trac tickets to organize our work.
It's not very hard to filter them out if you don't want them.
Oh, and there isn't usually such a volume of such mails. There's a flood
this afternoon because jlaska is filing tickets to cover the F14 cycle
recommendations that came out of the F13 retrospective.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
3:51 p.m.
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 16:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
If this is policy, and not a mistake, I shall soon be unsubscribing.
Thanks for your concerns and suggestions for improvement. :)
The fedora-qa TRAC instance has been sending ticket notifications to
this list since January. The volume is typically low, so I can
understand why you may not have noticed. You're getting a lot of mail
right now as I queue up a batch of tickets to track QA improvements for
Fedora 14.
The ticket volume will slow down shortly.
Thanks,
James
7:25 p.m.
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 16:51 -0400, James Laska wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 16:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> If this is policy, and not a mistake, I shall soon be unsubscribing.
Thanks for your concerns and suggestions for improvement. :)
The fedora-qa TRAC instance has been sending ticket notifications to
this list since January. The volume is typically low, so I can
understand why you may not have noticed. You're getting a lot of mail
right now as I queue up a batch of tickets to track QA improvements for
Fedora 14.
I don't object to this but I also did wonder what was going on. It might
have been a good idea to announce this change when it happened (or did I
miss the announcement?)
poc
10:35 p.m.
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 19:55 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I don't object to this but I also did wonder what was going on.
It might
have been a good idea to announce this change when it happened (or did I
miss the announcement?)
There wasn't a change, that's what we're explaining =) the tickets have
always gone to this ML. there was just a brief bump in traffic.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
11:39 p.m.
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 20:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 19:55 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I don't object to this but I also did wonder what was going on. It might
> have been a good idea to announce this change when it happened (or did I
> miss the announcement?)
There wasn't a change, that's what we're explaining =) the tickets have
always gone to this ML. there was just a brief bump in traffic.
James Laska's earlier reply said:
The fedora-qa TRAC instance has been sending ticket
notifications to this list since January. The volume is
typically low, so I can understand why you may not have noticed.
This implies that a change occurred around January, which agrees with my
archived mail. The earliest such message is dated Jan. 7.
poc
12:24 a.m.
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 22:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Thanks, that's what I wanted to know. And of course having checked the
link I do now remember seeing it at the time.
poc
2:03 a.m.
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 00:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 20:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 19:55 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > I don't object to this but I also did wonder what was going on. It might
> > have been a good idea to announce this change when it happened (or did I
> > miss the announcement?)
>
> There wasn't a change, that's what we're explaining =) the tickets have
> always gone to this ML. there was just a brief bump in traffic.
James Laska's earlier reply said:
The fedora-qa TRAC instance has been sending ticket
notifications to this list since January. The volume is
typically low, so I can understand why you may not have noticed.
This implies that a change occurred around January, which agrees with my
archived mail. The earliest such message is dated Jan. 7.
Oh, I see what you mean now. Sorry!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
5071
days inactive
5072
days old
9 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Adam Williamson -
James Laska -
Kevin Fenzi -
Patrick O'Callaghan -
Tom Lane