On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:06 PM Kamil Paral
<kparal(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I tested the RPM and the Flatpak on Fedora Workstation 36 on an Intel
GPU. I flashed Fedora Kinoite 36 Beta to a USB stick using it
successfully.
With both the RPM and the Flatpak, I noticed that it doesn't follow
the light/dark preference from GNOME, but that's probably
QGnomePlatform there.
With the RPM, the panels don't seem to have any imagery? The picture
of the main window in the readme has a graphic that doesn't show up on
my installed version. No graphic on the downloading and writing panels
either. At the end when it's finished, the main window still says writing to
disk, even though the notification was pushed that it finished, so it
didn't switch to the "finished" window pane. Closing it in this
scenario seems harmless, but confusing. Otherwise, it seems to work fine.
Missing runtime dependency on qt6-qtsvg. I will fix that. Not sure about the
wrong state, I will try to reproduce.
When testing the Flatpak, it seems to work the same, except the
imagery shows up and the finished writing panel shows up. The Flatpak
downloads ISOs much more slowly than the RPM (like several orders
slower!).
This is weird, I'm now testing both and have same results. As the code for
download hasn't change since the old FMW version I don't think this is a
new issue in FMW 5.0.0.
> Are the RPM and the Flatpak built from the same commit? If so, there
> might be a packaging bug in the RPM one.
>
>
>
>
> --
> 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!