4:13 p.m.
i would really like to use fc164 but i cant make an iso. i went to the
linuxtx.org site but i still cant get the iso to find the fedora cd.. is
there anywhere else with the fedora iso around?
thanks
--
jason pearl <jpearl24(a)cox.net>
GNU Linux
4:27 p.m.
Hi,
i would really like to use fc164 but i cant make an iso. i went to
the
linuxtx.org site but i still cant get the iso to find the fedora cd..
is there anywhere else with the fedora iso around?
Can you not use bittorrent?
TTFN
Paul
--
One OS to fool them all
One browser to find them
One email client to bring them all
And through security holes, blind them...
5:24 p.m.
is there a place with the bit torrent files?
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 15:27, Paul wrote:
Hi,
> i would really like to use fc164 but i cant make an iso. i went to the
> linuxtx.org site but i still cant get the iso to find the fedora cd..
> is there anywhere else with the fedora iso around?
Can you not use bittorrent?
TTFN
Paul
5:27 p.m.
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 18:24, jason pearl wrote:
is there a place with the bit torrent files?
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 15:27, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > i would really like to use fc164 but i cant make an iso. i went to the
> > linuxtx.org site but i still cant get the iso to find the fedora cd..
> > is there anywhere else with the fedora iso around?
>
> Can you not use bittorrent?
>
> TTFN
>
> Paul
Hi Jason,
Please don't include your sig that includes images in messages to this
or any other mailing list.
The size of your message was 31K, that's ridiculous.
-sv
5:39 p.m.
ya i forgot to take it out ... i use cable so it dont affect me
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 16:27, seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 18:24, jason pearl wrote:
> is there a place with the bit torrent files?
>
>
> On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 15:27, Paul wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > i would really like to use fc164 but i cant make an iso. i went to the
> > > linuxtx.org site but i still cant get the iso to find the fedora cd..
> > > is there anywhere else with the fedora iso around?
> >
> > Can you not use bittorrent?
> >
> > TTFN
> >
> > Paul
Hi Jason,
Please don't include your sig that includes images in messages to this
or any other mailing list.
The size of your message was 31K, that's ridiculous.
-sv
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
5:46 p.m.
Hi,
is there a place with the bit torrent files?
Christ, that was a big bloomin' sig file! Okay, I'm on cable as well,
but it's still a PITA to d/l it!
Have a look at the fedora.redhat.com site - there is a link to where to
get the bittorrent isos from (and also bittorrent 3.3 itself)
Failing that, I'm happy to post out the 3 CDs with the binary version to
anyone in the UK.
TTFN
Paul
--
One OS to fool them all
One browser to find them
One email client to bring them all
And through security holes, blind them...
5:54 p.m.
hmmmm and its the 64 bit version???
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 16:46, Paul wrote:
Hi,
> is there a place with the bit torrent files?
Christ, that was a big bloomin' sig file! Okay, I'm on cable as well,
but it's still a PITA to d/l it!
Have a look at the fedora.redhat.com site - there is a link to where to
get the bittorrent isos from (and also bittorrent 3.3 itself)
Failing that, I'm happy to post out the 3 CDs with the binary version to
anyone in the UK.
TTFN
Paul
5:54 p.m.
and turn off the mime/html stuff too...
oh yeah and stop top posting :-p
Joel
--------
From: jason pearl <jpearl24(a)cox.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:39:05 -0700
To: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
Subj: Re: iso images
--=-X+z3BDPicDGOWwZz8MFY
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-8UvqZrTXccVntNq37eDF"
--=-8UvqZrTXccVntNq37eDF
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
ya i forgot to take it out ... i use cable so it dont affect me=20
5:59 p.m.
what is top posting???
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 16:54, Joel Young wrote:
and turn off the mime/html stuff too...
oh yeah and stop top posting :-p
Joel
--------
From: jason pearl <jpearl24(a)cox.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:39:05 -0700
To: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
Subj: Re: iso images
--=-X+z3BDPicDGOWwZz8MFY
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-8UvqZrTXccVntNq37eDF"
--=-8UvqZrTXccVntNq37eDF
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
ya i forgot to take it out ... i use cable so it dont affect me=20
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
--
jason pearl <jpearl24(a)cox.net>
GNU Linux
12:59 a.m.
jason pearl wrote:
what is top posting???
It's an a-rententive obsession on Fedora/Red Hat lists that some people
get just too worked up over. Anyway, it means responding to a message at
the top, rather than below. In the real world, replying on top is done
as a courtesy to make it easy to read new information - so as not to
force the reader to go searching through a mile of much to find what you
have to say.
In theory, bottom posting on a list is supposed to make it easy to deal
with threads - you know, so it becomes easier to deal with a string of
messages. It is a valid point, though some people seem to get abnormally
worked up about. Happy bottom posting.
ralston
3:31 a.m.
Hi,
>what is top posting???
>
It's an a-rententive obsession on Fedora/Red Hat lists that some people
get just too worked up over.
Nope. It's not a case of that, it's a case of following the RFCs and
also how people conduct conversations. When was the last time you called
a friend and gave them an answer to a question they ask after you're
finished.
Anyway, it means responding to a message at
the top, rather than below. In the real world, replying on top is done
as a courtesy to make it easy to read new information - so as not to
force the reader to go searching through a mile of much to find what you
have to say.
What rot! You go to *any* technical usenet group (excluding MS specific
ones) and top post - you'll be shot down in flames! Why is simple. Say
you ask a number of questions and someone top posts answers, it is never
clear what they're answering to (even if they include the entire
previous 8 postings as they've not discovered the ctrl-x combination
yet) and so the number of mistakes and misconceptions which occur leap
up.
The biggest misconception is that it saves time. Sure, if the example is
simple enough (how are you?) then it's not that bad. However, in the
above example, the reader (who may not be as knowledgeable as the
sender) will have to work through not only the answer, but try to marry
it up to the points raised. That takes a hell of a lot of time in some
cases.
In theory, bottom posting on a list is supposed to make it easy to
deal
with threads - you know, so it becomes easier to deal with a string of
messages.
It is. Posting in context (rather than straight bottom posting) makes
things even easier still.
It is a valid point, though some people seem to get abnormally
worked up about. Happy bottom posting.
Contextual posting is better :-)
TTFN
Paul
--
Free your mind to a time where a company does not have control
Free your mind to a choice of applications which you can control
Free your mind from the closed world of those who seek total power
Free your mind to the wonderful world of free software
6:51 a.m.
--- PFJ <paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk> wrote:
What rot! You go to *any* technical usenet group
(excluding MS specific
ones) and top post - you'll be shot down in flames!
Actually, there are other technical groups that
top-post, the NIH-ImageJ group for one. In fact, I'd
never even heard of the -posting controversy before
joining this group.
Mike Smith
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
2:45 p.m.
Thus spake jason pearl (jpearl24(a)cox.net):
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 16:54, Joel Young wrote:
> and turn off the mime/html stuff too...
>
> oh yeah and stop top posting :-p
>
While we're at it,
`gpg --keyserver certserver.pgp.com --send-key jpearl24(a)cox.net`
I'll stop now.
j.
5:33 p.m.
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 13:45, j. ercole wrote:
Thus spake jason pearl (jpearl24(a)cox.net):
> On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 16:54, Joel Young wrote:
> > and turn off the mime/html stuff too...
> >
> > oh yeah and stop top posting :-p
> >
While we're at it,
`gpg --keyserver certserver.pgp.com --send-key jpearl24(a)cox.net`
I'll stop now.
j.
mines at keyserver.net
cant find yours either....
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
gpg: Signature made Thu 18 Dec 2003 01:45:14 PM MST using DSA key ID
D8FBA309
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
--
jason pearl <jpearl24(a)cox.net>
++++++++++++++++++
"Keep your friends close and your enemies closer"-Tupac
++++++++++++++++++
Kurrupted Visionz Phx, AZ registered linux user #307811
MDK 9.2 Linux http://counter.li.org
AMD64 Opteron 1.6
ASUS SK8N
7456
days inactive
7458
days old
19 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
j. ercole -
jason pearl -
Joel -
Michael Smith -
Paul F. Johnson -
rg -
seth vidal