Did I miss something along the way of running rawhide that it seems that for example firefox.i386 and helixplayer aren't able to install?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=155790
That was closed, but I don't seem to be able to yum install firefox.i386
cat /proc/sys/abi/vsyscall32 1
Not sure if that is supposed to be 0
This is also a little confusing, why are there some mozilla packages show up for i386, but not the main mozilla package
yum list | grep mozilla mozilla.x86_64 37:1.7.8-2 installed mozilla-devel.x86_64 37:1.7.8-2 installed mozilla-nspr.i386 37:1.7.8-2 installed mozilla-nspr.x86_64 37:1.7.8-2 installed mozilla-nspr-devel.x86_64 37:1.7.8-2 installed mozilla-nss.x86_64 37:1.7.8-2 installed mozilla-nss.i386 37:1.7.8-2 installed mozilla-nss-devel.x86_64 37:1.7.8-2 installed mozilla-chat.x86_64 37:1.7.8-2 development mozilla-debuginfo.x86_64 37:1.7.8-2 development mozilla-dom-inspector.x86_64 37:1.7.8-2 development mozilla-js-debugger.x86_64 37:1.7.8-2 development mozilla-mail.x86_64 37:1.7.8-2 development mozilla-opensc-signer.x86_64 0.9.6-2 extras-developme
firefox.x86_64 1.0.4-5 installed firefox-debuginfo.x86_64 1.0.4-5 development
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 23:50 -0500, Justin Conover wrote:
Did I miss something along the way of running rawhide that it seems that for example firefox.i386 and helixplayer aren't able to install?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=155790
That was closed, but I don't seem to be able to yum install firefox.i386
I do remember being able to installed i386 packages while using FC4 Test releases. I noticed it wasn't the same in FC4. I ended up doing the same thing I did with FC3. Setting up duplicate repository files in /etc/yum.repos.d. I change the $basearch references to i386 and rename the file from fedora.repo to fedora-i386.repo. Then you have to use yum install package.x86_64 instead of yum install package. Otherwise you will get the i386 and x86_64 versions.
On 7/1/05, Nathan Grennan fedora-test-list@cygnusx-1.org wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 23:50 -0500, Justin Conover wrote:
Did I miss something along the way of running rawhide that it seems that for example firefox.i386 and helixplayer aren't able to install?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=155790
That was closed, but I don't seem to be able to yum install firefox.i386
I do remember being able to installed i386 packages while using FC4 Test releases. I noticed it wasn't the same in FC4. I ended up doing the same thing I did with FC3. Setting up duplicate repository files in /etc/yum.repos.d. I change the $basearch references to i386 and rename the file from fedora.repo to fedora-i386.repo. Then you have to use yum install package.x86_64 instead of yum install package. Otherwise you will get the i386 and x86_64 versions.
yum --enablerepo=development-i386 install firefox.i386 <snip> Installing: firefox i386 1.0.4-5 development-i386 18 M Installing for dependencies: libbonoboui i386 2.8.1-4 development-i386 356 k libgnome i386 2.10.0-3 development-i386 705 k libgnomeui i386 2.10.0-1 development-i386 848 k
Thank you, didn't think of that :D
On 7/1/05, Justin Conover justin.conover@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/1/05, Nathan Grennan fedora-test-list@cygnusx-1.org wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 23:50 -0500, Justin Conover wrote:
Did I miss something along the way of running rawhide that it seems that for example firefox.i386 and helixplayer aren't able to install?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=155790
That was closed, but I don't seem to be able to yum install firefox.i386
I do remember being able to installed i386 packages while using FC4 Test releases. I noticed it wasn't the same in FC4. I ended up doing the same thing I did with FC3. Setting up duplicate repository files in /etc/yum.repos.d. I change the $basearch references to i386 and rename the file from fedora.repo to fedora-i386.repo. Then you have to use yum install package.x86_64 instead of yum install package. Otherwise you will get the i386 and x86_64 versions.
yum --enablerepo=development-i386 install firefox.i386
<snip> Installing: firefox i386 1.0.4-5 development-i386 18 M Installing for dependencies: libbonoboui i386 2.8.1-4 development-i386 356 k libgnome i386 2.10.0-3 development-i386 705 k libgnomeui i386 2.10.0-1 development-i386 848 k
Thank you, didn't think of that :D
So should this still be considered a BUG or just and added feature. ;)