On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 09:18 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On 10/18/05, Karsten Wade <kwade(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Fedora Documentation > fedora-websites
>
> All bugs for all formal Fedora websites should use this component.
Can there be a clear... enumerated listing...as to what counts as a
"formal" site in the definition of that bugzilla component?
Argh! You caught me ... curses! Foiled again.
I was trying to avoid the loaded term "official", so I have started
calling things "formal".
Consensus decisions that become "the-way-it's-done" == "formal".
For us, it really can only mean sites we control the domain, hosting,
etc. of. I'll see if there is a way to get that into the bugzilla
description, but I
The bugzilla description now[1] reads:
"Problems and requests for all formal Fedora Project websites. This
list is currently:
fedoraproject.org and fedora.redhat.com."
[1] Now is relative to when some magic-fu happens.
I guess the
fedoraproject.org mainpage and wiki header/footer should
have a link back to this "formalized" bugzilla component.
Yeah, that would be cool.
-jef"if only we had a servicable trademark that could be used
exclusively on formal sites to help distinguish which sites are
tracked in the central bugzilla...."spaleta
Yeah, and a link to a pre-filled bugzilla request.
- Karsten
-jef
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list --
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer *
http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/