7:36 a.m.
Right now, Fedora Magazine content says "Copyright Fedora Magazine. All
Rights Reserved" at the bottom. Is "Fedora Magazine" an entity which can
actually hold copyrights?
I think we should change this to something more like the copyright notice at
the bottom of the wiki --
Copyright © 2014 Red Hat, Inc. and others. All Rights Reserved. For
comments or queries, please contact us. The Fedora Project is maintained
and driven by the community and sponsored by Red Hat. This is a community
maintained site. Red Hat is not responsible for content. Content is
available under Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported unless otherwise
noted.
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
7:39 a.m.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:36:41AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
Copyright © 2014 Red Hat, Inc. and others. All Rights Reserved.
For
comments or queries, please contact us. The Fedora Project is maintained
and driven by the community and sponsored by Red Hat. This is a community
maintained site. Red Hat is not responsible for content. Content is
available under Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported unless otherwise
noted.
Although I note that the license link at the bottom of the wiki goes to
Legal:Main. That should probably actually go to a page about the license
either on our site or the CC site.
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
8:13 a.m.
I will get it fixed :)
- Chris Roberts
>> Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> 03/26/14 8:40
AM >>>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:36:41AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
Copyright © 2014 Red Hat, Inc. and others. All Rights Reserved.
For
comments or queries, please contact us. The Fedora Project is
maintained
and driven by the community and sponsored by Red Hat. This is a
community
maintained site. Red Hat is not responsible for content. Content
is
available under Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported unless
otherwise
noted.
Although I note that the license link at the bottom of the wiki goes to
Legal:Main. That should probably actually go to a page about the license
either on our site or the CC site.
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project --
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
--
marketing mailing list
marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
8:18 a.m.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:13:08AM -0400, Chris Roberts wrote:
I will get it fixed :)
I can make a ticket as always. I just thought this particular one might want
some discussion. But maybe not. :)
--
Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
8:29 a.m.
Matt,
I agree after replying with the last email. I am going to wait and keep it up in the air
for a few days. That way we can get input from the other members especially since its
relating to legal. Since its something that can be changed within a few minutes, once a
general consensus is made, we can change it on the fly.
- Chris Roberts
>> Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org> 03/26/14 9:19 AM
>>>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:13:08AM -0400, Chris Roberts wrote:
I will get it fixed :)
I can make a ticket as always. I just thought this particular one might want
some discussion. But maybe not. :)
--
Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
8:30 a.m.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:29:25AM -0400, Chris Roberts wrote:
I agree after replying with the last email. I am going to wait and
keep it
up in the air for a few days. That way we can get input from the other
members especially since its relating to legal. Since its something that
can be changed within a few minutes, once a general consensus is made, we
can change it on the fly.
I'm thinking: if people are generally okay with the idea, we then send the
proposal to legal for ack.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
8:36 a.m.
+1 to this
>> Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org> 03/26/14 9:32 AM
>>>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:29:25AM -0400, Chris Roberts wrote:
I agree after replying with the last email. I am going to wait and
keep it
up in the air for a few days. That way we can get input from the other
members especially since its relating to legal. Since its something that
can be changed within a few minutes, once a general consensus is made, we
can change it on the fly.
I'm thinking: if people are generally okay with the idea, we then send the
proposal to legal for ack.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
8:40 a.m.
TBH, not sure when that got changed. We walked it through Red Hat legal when we started.
It should say:
The opinions expressed on this website are those of each author, not of the author's
employer or of Red Hat. Fedora Magazine aspires to publish all content under a Creative
Commons license but may not be able to do so in all cases. You are responsible for
ensuring that you have the necessary permission to reuse any work on this site. The Fedora
logo is a trademark of Red Hat, Inc.
There's also a related Terms of Use document that I know I put in when we started, but
I can't find it on the site anymore. I'm guessing something happened in a redesign
or update or something?
----- Original Message -----
+1 to this
>>> Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org> 03/26/14 9:32
AM >>>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:29:25AM -0400, Chris Roberts wrote:
> I agree after replying with the last email. I am going to wait and keep it
> up in the air for a few days. That way we can get input from the other
> members especially since its relating to legal. Since its something that
> can be changed within a few minutes, once a general consensus is made, we
> can change it on the fly.
I'm thinking: if people are generally okay with the idea, we then
send the
proposal to legal for ack.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
--
marketing mailing list
marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
8:44 a.m.
Ruth,
I will get it changed back to what it originally was supposed to be. I am not sure when
it got changed. Its possible it got changed when I rebuilt it. I do know a few posts got
corrupted as well as the main database.
- Chris Roberts
>> Ruth Suehle <rsuehle(a)redhat.com> 03/26/14 9:41 AM
>>>
TBH, not sure when that got changed. We walked it through Red Hat legal
when we started. It should say:
The opinions expressed on this website are those of each author, not of the author's
employer or of Red Hat.
Fedora Magazine aspires to publish all content under a Creative Commons license but may
not be able to do so in all cases. You are responsible for ensuring that you have the
necessary permission to reuse any work on this site. The Fedora logo is a trademark of Red
Hat, Inc.
There's also a related Terms of Use document that I know I put in when we started, but
I can't find it on the site anymore. I'm guessing something happened in a redesign
or update or something?
9:32 a.m.
2014-03-26 10:40 GMT-03:00 Ruth Suehle <rsuehle(a)redhat.com>:
The opinions expressed on this website are those of each author, not
of
the author's employer or of Red Hat.
Fedora Magazine aspires to publish all content under a Creative Commons
license <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/> but may not be able to do
so in all cases. You are responsible for ensuring that you have the
necessary permission to reuse any work on this site. The Fedora logo is a
trademark of Red Hat, Inc.
I think that's the best wording so far. +1
--
Marcel Ribeiro Dantas,
Biomedical Engineering Researcher at LAIS
Laboratory for Technological Innovation in Healthcare (LAIS-HUOL)
Free Software Advocate - "An idea is only knowledge, when shared."
http://mribeirodantas.fedorapeople.org
mribeirodantas at fedoraproject.org
mribeirodantas at lais.huol.ufrn.br
9:40 a.m.
This is a good form. +1
Il giorno mer, 26/03/2014 alle 11.32 -0300, Marcel Ribeiro Dantas ha
scritto:
2014-03-26 10:40 GMT-03:00 Ruth Suehle <rsuehle(a)redhat.com>:
The opinions expressed on this website are those of each
author, not of the author's employer or of Red Hat.
Fedora Magazine aspires to publish all content under a
Creative Commons license but may not be able to do so in all
cases. You are responsible for ensuring that you have the
necessary permission to reuse any work on this site. The
Fedora logo is a trademark of Red Hat, Inc.
I think that's the best wording so far. +1
--
Marcel Ribeiro Dantas,
Biomedical Engineering Researcher at LAIS
Laboratory for Technological Innovation in Healthcare (LAIS-HUOL)
Free Software Advocate - "An idea is only knowledge, when shared."
http://mribeirodantas.fedorapeople.org
mribeirodantas at fedoraproject.org
mribeirodantas at lais.huol.ufrn.br
8:41 a.m.
On Mar 26, 2014 7:35 AM, "Chris Roberts" <croberts(a)croberts.org> wrote:
+1 to this
>>> Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org> 03/26/14 9:32 AM >>>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:29:25AM -0400, Chris Roberts wrote:
> I agree after replying with the last email. I am going to wait and keep
it
> up in the air for a few days. That way we can get input from the
other
> members especially since its relating to legal. Since its something that
> can be changed within a few minutes, once a general consensus is made,
we
> can change it on the fly.
I'm thinking: if people are generally okay with the idea, we then send the
proposal to legal for ack.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
--
CC-BY-SA comes with nice logos and some blurbs you can append. If you want
something more verbose, take a look at the Docs legal boilerplate. It comes
from 'publican-fedora' if it matters. Consistency between docs and the
magazine isn't really important IMO, but one legal policy for Fedora
content might save some effort .
--Pete
3693
days inactive
3693
days old
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
11 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Chris A. Roberts -
Giuseppe Pignataro -
Marcel Ribeiro Dantas -
Matthew Miller -
Matthew Miller -
Pete Travis -
Ruth Suehle