1:29 p.m.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Richard Fontana <rfontana(a)redhat.com>wrote:
This is for fedoramagazine.org? (When I get a moment I'll look at
the
archives for the marketing list.) I see a legal note in the footer
that is reminiscent of the same for opensource.com.
Yes, to summarize what happened on this thread earlier in the day, I worked
with Amanda Newby to create a footer and terms of use that were based on
the ones we used for opensource.com. At some point in a migration or
upgrade or something, they both evaporated and were replaced with
"Copyright Fedora Magazine," which obviously needed to be fixed. But if
osdc has switched up to CC 4, maybe we should revisit for FM as well?
1:32 p.m.
New subject: [Fedora-legal-list] Copyright Submission Proposal
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 02:29:39PM -0400, Ruth Suehle wrote:
"Copyright Fedora Magazine," which obviously needed to be
fixed. But if
osdc has switched up to CC 4, maybe we should revisit for FM as well?
I think it's worth at least looking at updating for Fedora content in
general.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
1:41 p.m.
New subject: [Fedora-legal-list] Copyright Submission Proposal
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm(a)mattdm.org>
To: "Ruth Suehle" <rsuehle(a)gmail.com>
Cc: "Richard Fontana" <rfontana(a)redhat.com>, "Fedora Marketing
team" <marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>,
legal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 11:32:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Copyright Submission Proposal
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 02:29:39PM -0400, Ruth Suehle wrote:
> "Copyright Fedora Magazine," which obviously needed to be fixed. But if
> osdc has switched up to CC 4, maybe we should revisit for FM as well?
I think it's worth at least looking at updating for Fedora content in
general.
Agreed. TBH, I think if we're going to go that route, it should be in the context of
the FPCA and our current list of "good licenses", and not just for the Magazine
- trying to maintain separate lists of folks who have agreed to contribute under a license
aside from signing the FPCA just feels like a lot of work for caring for special
snowflakes, esp. when we don't have a mechanism currently in place to do so.
-r
--
Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
--
marketing mailing list
marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
5:13 p.m.
New subject: [Fedora-legal-list] Copyright Submission Proposal
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 02:29:39PM -0400, Ruth Suehle wrote:
Yes, to summarize what happened on this thread earlier in the day, I
worked
with Amanda Newby to create a footer and terms of use that were based on
the ones we used for opensource.com. At some point in a migration or
upgrade or something, they both evaporated and were replaced with
"Copyright Fedora Magazine," which obviously needed to be fixed. But if
osdc has switched up to CC 4, maybe we should revisit for FM as well?
Ruth, I notice that many opensource.com articles have a little CC-BY-SA logo
at the bottom. Are *you* using the Wordpress license plugin (as in
https://fedorahosted.org/marketing-team/ticket/159 which started all this)?
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
5:17 p.m.
New subject: [Fedora-legal-list] Copyright Submission Proposal
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 06:13:00PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 02:29:39PM -0400, Ruth Suehle wrote:
> Yes, to summarize what happened on this thread earlier in the day, I worked
> with Amanda Newby to create a footer and terms of use that were based on
> the ones we used for opensource.com. At some point in a migration or
> upgrade or something, they both evaporated and were replaced with
> "Copyright Fedora Magazine," which obviously needed to be fixed. But if
> osdc has switched up to CC 4, maybe we should revisit for FM as well?
Ruth, I notice that many opensource.com articles have a little CC-BY-SA logo
at the bottom. Are *you* using the Wordpress license plugin (as in
https://fedorahosted.org/marketing-team/ticket/159 which started all this)?
Just to bring up some ancient history, I believe Fedora Legal
determined that the terms applicable to the CC logos were inconsistent
with Fedora legal policies. I'm not sure whether that view was revised
or whether it even applies to Fedora Magazine.
- RF
3693
days inactive
3693
days old
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
4 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Matthew Miller -
Matthew Miller -
Richard Fontana -
Robyn Bergeron -
Ruth Suehle