On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack <mspevack(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on something from > Red Hat Legal. > > What exactly are we blocking on? > > --Max > > -- > Fedora-marketing-list mailing list > Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list > release forms -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack wrote: >>> Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on something >>> from Red Hat Legal. >>> >>> What exactly are we blocking on? Per this message it's spot: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2009-January/msg000...

Though someone was tasked with following up on this at the last meeting I attended and I don't recall who that was, and I don't see meeting minutes anywhere.

Nicu Buculei wrote: > David Nalley wrote: >>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack wrote: >>>>> Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on >>>>> something >>>>> from Red Hat Legal. >>>>> >>>>> What exactly are we blocking on? >> >> Per this message it's spot: >> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2009-January/msg000... > > Yes, that is. We have to hunt people and ask for signatures. And as we > don't know what to ask for, we have to wait. > >> Though someone was tasked with following up on this at the last >> meeting I attended and I don't recall who that was, and I don't see >> meeting minutes anywhere. I tried to get in contact with spot and was unsuccessful the past two days. Either way, I would like to say that I now have the ball on this and will make sure it gets done ASAP.

Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 12:39:47PM -0500, Jack Aboutboul wrote: > >> Nicu Buculei wrote: >> >>> David Nalley wrote: >>> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on >>>>>>> something >>>>>>> from Red Hat Legal. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What exactly are we blocking on? >>>>>>> >>>> Per this message it's spot: >>>> >>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2009-January/msg000... >>>> >>> Yes, that is. We have to hunt people and ask for signatures. And as >>> we don't know what to ask for, we have to wait. >>> >>> >>>> Though someone was tasked with following up on this at the last >>>> meeting I attended and I don't recall who that was, and I don't see >>>> meeting minutes anywhere. >>>> >> I tried to get in contact with spot and was unsuccessful the past two >> days. Either way, I would like to say that I now have the ball on >> this and will make sure it gets done ASAP. >> > > Cool. Spot is at FOSDEM right now. Based on how things go at shows, > I bet he'll be in emergency-triage mode for email for a while, so the > delay's understandable. > > Didnt realize that, that could explain the delay. I will try and contact him next week and see if I can officially take this off his plate.

Paul W. Frields wrote: > Since Spot is the primary contact point for legal, i.e. the "Fedora > Legal" coordinator, why don't we allow him to chase this down. But he > should communicate the status to you if you're minding the Picture > Book project from the high level. > > So let it be written, so let it be done....

On 2009-02-06 at 23:45:29 -0500, Ian Weller <ianweller(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > All I know is that we're waiting on RH Legal to write up an acceptable > release form that can be used for this project (something more broad > than the release forms used at FUDConF11; those were temporary). > > We block on that. Then we can start the picture uploading. I've poked RH Legal again, hopefully they will either give us something or an ETA on when we can expect it.