On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Colin Charles wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 08:51 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> David Barzilay wrote:
> >
http://www.apac.redhat.com/news/article/346.html
>
> Is there any reason why
http://www.fedoraproject.org.cn/ look like the
> old and ugly
http://www.fedoraproject.org/, instead of the current
> layout?
>From what I can see, it just links back to the fp.o site.
Now, I have a few questions:
1. was RH ever going to ask/consult/tell us about
fedoraproject.org.cn /before/ its inception?
I find this lack of communication not positive.
I've said this before and I'll say it again:
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
The fact is that the Chinese organization runs, as near as I can tell,
completely autonomously. They wanted to have a local mirror, so they
created one. It's not the prettiest thing in the world, to be sure, but
it does the job -- by (a) putting up a local mirror, and (b) linking back
to the authoritative content at fp.o with *every other link*.
2. Is the content there going to be localised? Last I checked, RH
Beijing was hiring ~80 staff (earlier this year), so how important is
RHEL/Fedora there?
We're trying to get in touch with the Chinese folks to understand what
their plans are.
3. Competition from Sun Wah Linux and Red Flag linux (I think
they're
now a fedora/chinese spinoff) is rife. Thoughts?
My first thought is that we need a Chinese CMC.
--g
_____________________ ____________________________________________
Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent. the
Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the
] [ dumb. --mcluhan