#152: Test Cases Management
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15
Component: Wiki | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: retrospective
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by rhe):
Replying to [comment:8 rhe]:
proposal page] has been updated and written in the table format.
To further identify this issue, the following items will be analysed in
details one by one:
- Identify our current test workflows (or use cases)
- Objectively compare feature sets of both tools in relation to
the important workflows
Since I called for the final review of these two item last week, from this
week, I will move to next step and the pages are moved to formal links:
*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tcms_use_cases
*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tcms_Comparison
But feedback is still welcomed to improve them.
- Identify problems with our current system and workflows - e.g.
what would we like to do but are difficult/impossible with wiki
- Identify+prioritize any feature gaps we'd need from nitrate in
order to make a smooth transition
These two issues can be considered together. This week I will focus on
identifying Must-Have and Nice-to-Have features in the
[
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tcms_Comparison comparison table], and
then summarize in another page.
Meanwhile, I will start the transition preparation work to write scripts
for conversing xml files exported from wiki to files whose format can be
imported to nitrate. Feel free to add comments/ideas/suggestions. Thanks.
--
Ticket URL: <
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/152#comment:16>
Fedora QA <
http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance