Dan Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>"not production ready" eg not ready for deployment in ISP production
>>environment. When people stop filing critical selinux bugs in buzilla then
>>it will be production ready :-)
>>
>>
>Using just the number of bug reports to assert whether something is
>production ready or not looks like a bad idea to me. Take a look at the
>bug count against any major package like the kernel or xorg for comparison
>
>
I'm not using just the number. I'm using the criticality of the bugs. Eg
showstoppers.
Would _you_ seriously deploy FC4T3+selinux in a corporate production
server right now?
good joke :-)
[...] not production ready [...] seriously deploy FCxTx+selinux in a
corporate production [...]
*
*http://www.net-security.org/search.php?sort=0&keyword=selinux&search.x=0&search.y=0
->
http://www.net-security.org/news.php?id=7755
->
http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid39_gci1082560...
<snip>
*"Think before deploying Security-Enhanced Linux in RHEL 4"
*One of the most exciting new features in RHEL v.4 is the implementation
of Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux). In this tip, we'll look at how you
can use it to beef up system security.
</snip>
--
shrek-m