On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
<johannbg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Just bringing this topic to the appropriate mailing list
On the last kernel meeting [1] it was suggested negative karma points should
be linked to a reported bug which kinda makes sense if you think about it.
What that means is that you ( as in reporter ) will no longer be able to
provide negative karma without linking it to an already existing bug report
either created by your or someone else if that came to be.
Is there such a surplus of people testing things and providing
negative karma that it's acceptable to refuse any that doesn't come
with a bug report? And is the pain of bugless negative karma so great
that it will overcome the cost of an additional mandatory step in the
karma reporting process?
Why not start by sending email nags to people who've added negative
karma but who haven't provided a buglink?