Re: Developing secondary architecture release criteria

On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 11:03 -0400, James Laska wrote: >> If doable we should try to come up with a solution aimed at/fits >> multiple release cycles > How do you mean ... something that works for Fedora 13, 14, 15, 16 > etc... ? We have that now, I just didn't include any details about how > the pages are updated when a new release comes along. Adam and I have > talked about an SOP to cover this, but we don't have any thing final > yet. I think by 'multiple release cycles' he meant the case where we release the DVD and two live images in June, the other live images in July and the PPC images in August, or whatever.