On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 09:24:59AM -0700, alan wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Axel Thimm wrote:
>Hi,
>
>usually ATrpms jumps into testing at test2 or test3. This time we'll
>try supporting FC6 from test1 onwards.
>
>A couple of notes:
>
>o ATrpms uses disttags of 5.90 matching the internal verisoning of
> test1. When test2 hits the road packages will all be rebuilt with
> 5.91 as a disttag and so on. That way upgrade paths are retained
> (but these are not guaranteed within test releases/rawhide anyway,
> so don't feel on the safe side) and rebuilds don't have to bump the
> buildtag in front of the disttag, so when your FC5 box has
> foo-1.2.3-4.* and test/rawhide bits also start with foo-1.2.3-4.* it
> means that the same sources/specfiles are still used.
>
>o kernel support (kmdls) is there, both for the test release kernel,
> 2.6.16-1.2289_FC6, as well as hopefully the latest rawhide kernel,
> 2.6.17-1.2318_FC6. Oops, the latest is already 2.6.17-1.2328.fc6,
> and by the time you're reading this probably even further. The point
> is that ATrpms will try to support the latest rawhide kernel, but it
> certainly can't keep up to the pace of rawhide. :)
>
>o Please report bugs, especially regression wrt FC5 on
>
bugzilla.atrpms.net under fc6.
Cool. The only problem I see is that the nVIDIA kernel driver is bjorken
with xorg 7.1. (And will be until they create a Linux driver for the 9xxx
series of drivers.)
Are there x86_64 builds?
Yes, but only for the FC6t1 kernel (2.6.16-1.2289_FC6). I saw that the
build breaks for rawhide kernels, so I didn't make the nvidia builds
public, yet.
--
Axel.Thimm at
ATrpms.net