James Laska wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:31 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> Will Woods wrote:
>
>> At the usual time and place - #fedora-meeting on freenode, 1500UTC (that's
10AM US Eastern).
>>
>>
> So have we moved the meeting time from16:00 back to 15:00?
>
>> Agenda:
>>
>> - Fedora 11 Alpha
>> - status
>> - review of test procedures / results
>> - Wiki use
>> - Guidelines for naming test plans / test cases
>>
>> - QA team guidelines
>> - Who gets to vote on decisions? Sponsors?
>> - How do you get to be a QA team sponsor?
>> - How do you get to be a QA team member?
>> - What does being in the QA team require/provide?
>>
>>
> Let's first come up with a QA team made from the community for the community
> before coming up with any guidelines for QA
>
> I want everyone to take a look at
http://sqa.net/
> and consider the Fedora QA procedure will be moved in that direction.
>
> The idea is that there will be made QA board consisting of one
> representing from each SIG
>
> That representative task will be over sighting the QA of his SIG and
> this board over sighting the QA of the whole Fedoraproject.
>
There are good general quality practices and procedures listed at the
URL provide above. But they also assume a level of resources we don't
yet have. Over time as we gather more contributors, this could be
something to look into.
I say look into it now then add those contributes to the resource we have.
I do like the idea of outlining a structure so that specialty QA
groups
with similar interests can coalesce and provide service to other Fedora
teams. Leam Hall has begun pulling some of this together to flesh out a
new "Join Fedora" QA landing page.
Looking forward to the see that page.
JBG