-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 14:47:45 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
While I am at it, I reported a simple missing BuildRequires for pam
three
weeks ago, but I haven't seen any reaction on bugzilla yet
(
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101563).
Well, activity log disagrees:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_activity.cgi?id=101563
Why does it
have to take so long just to fix such a simple bug for which a fix is
provided? Not that I expect new pam rpms to be released for a single
BuildRequires, but a simple "this will be fixed in the next release" would
be nice.
Concerning missing buildrequires, it would be nice if someone from Red
Hat could post a short comment on how clean their build environment is
and whether they are interested in learning about src.rpm build
problems. Maybe flex is an essential component in Red Hat's build
environment? Similar to gcc/g++/make and a few other tools. There are
other packages with incomplete build requirements which fail to build in
a clean environment.
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/R21C0iMVcrivHFQRArMnAJ44+dKGCZtnuTRGY//YBnFSB3I+3QCfQLZm
Rk3dGygz5WkB7mS9IiV8u2Q=
=XJB+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----