On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500
Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> wrote:
>>>> Looks like somebody decided to move the
90-default.preset from
>>>> systemd to the fedora-release package without changing the
>>>> systemd package to reflect that and pushing out a new package
>>>> (as discussed about a year ago).
That change also caused problems installing stuff with generic
release that depend on lvm2. For example you can't build a generic
live image that will have anaconda on it for live installs.
Is there a bug? I'm not sure how that happened from this change...
I think the idea was to have product (edition) dependent presets,
but
I don't think the implementation was done well.
No, the idea was to move presets from systemd that didn't want to have
to change them to fedora-release that makes more sense and is
controlled by more Fedoray folks who can make changes as needed.
kevin