On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 19:00 -0500, Aaron Faanes wrote:
I believe the proven-testers draft is ready for review. It's
grown a
bit more ambitious, but I tried to stay true to the spirit of the
original draft - I did my best to only revise and clarify the content
without affecting its meaning. Still, it requires a look-over by some
knowledgeable folks to weed out inaccuracies, invalid assumptions,
etc. Here's the link:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Dafrito/Draft_proventesters_instructions
This looks excellent.
The discussion page asks about some other issues that I ran into,
specifically:
* The relationship between critpath actions and release criteria
They happen to be similar, but they're separate processes.
* A more exhaustive list of critpath actions
* The future of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/JoinProvenTesters and
if any content should be exchanged or merged between the two articles.
I think we should keep the separate page, and add a simple link to this
page, right after "Individuals must must be mentored and approved before
becoming proven testers. A proven tester is a member of the
proventesters group.", which reads "If you are interested in becoming a
proven tester, please see this page.", where 'this page' is a link to
JoinProvenTesters.
* Whether the article should be pushed to wiki/Proven_tester with a
{{Draft}} template. I'd like to do this to encourage contribution, but
that may be premature.
Personally I'd be fine with doing that at this point.
I definitely welcome any edits, corrections, and/or feedback on
these
questions and the submitted draft!
Thanks very much for your work!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net