On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 20:30 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Clever? Add a version to the soname after talking to upstream about
it.
If they think the library interface is not stable enough, they can still
use .so.0 instead of just .so
Alternatively, ship a dummy executable in the -devel package, which causes
rpmbuild to create an automatic soname dep. ;)
Heh, ok, both of those went through my mind too, glad we're on the same
page.
Peter Gordon, can you take this issue to upstream? We really would
rather not see unversioned shared objects.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?