James Laska writes:
Andre correctly reminded me that 'ssh' installer support is
not intended
as a replacement for a telnet install. Rather, it is a means for
enabling 'ssh' to remotely monitor install progress. Translation, you
can ssh into the installing system and monitor /tmp/*log or do whatever
else you want from a shell. Essentially, it provides the shell you
normally get on tty2, but over the network.
So, what's the new way to install on a remote machine where one has no
hands-on access? What do those of us with machines at dataplexes like
The Planet, or with virtual machines on services like Virtual Host do?
To my mind ssh would be a perfect replacement for telnet for all the
obvious security reasons.
If, however, the answer is vnc, then I'm compelled to point out that
leaves some of us out of the party.
Janina
Thanks,
James
--
test mailing list
test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
--
Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200
sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
Chair, Open Accessibility janina(a)a11y.org
Linux Foundation
http://a11y.org
Chair, Protocols & Formats
Web Accessibility Initiative
http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)