On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> How about we steal the logo for pup and put a little bitty hat on him?
That is indeed a cute logo, it would only need a creative person to do a
story about the relationship between the pup and the distro.
You say to put a hat on him: so what is the final resolution, hats are
allowed or forbidden?
A straight hat as a logo is clearly forbidden. A hat that is an element
of another logo may be acceptable. It'll certainly be easier to lobby
for.
When defining the rules for the logo we may want or not to impose
certain technical restrictions, like low number of colors (to not have
something expensive to print), the image to allow a monochrome variant
(to be possible to put in on faxes) etc.
I'll say this for everyone's benefit: the design folks at RH are perfectly
happy to spend cycles on this, and they understand these issues deeply.
So no worries there.
The one big rule, though: this logo needs to be extensible, right?
--g
_____________________ ____________________________________________
Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent. the
Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the
] [ dumb. --mcluhan