-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Barnes wrote:
I think the appropriate way to allow migration is simple:
Instead of the generic "No MP3 here" message, point to a URL on the
wiki. This URL can detail why we don't have MP3, what the
alternatives are, and where they can look for more information
about MP3 on Fedora. We are very limited in the wording we can
use, and we can't provide direct information to give people MP3
support, but we can point them to third-part sites that have that
information.
I'm confused... Why can't we provide direct information, even when it
involves using a third party tool? I mean is not like Fedora is
endosing any illegal activities or anything of the sort by pointing to
a legi source like Real Player... I don't understand why can't that be
said straight.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEFJT+XM+XOp70dwoRAnsxAJ9nQsWPULYEAdHrNXtdXKYy2x3OsgCfQgFO
pPwhe7ceWmgNknkeZkUq1qw=
=KXrp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----