[marketing] Re: [magazine] Re: Magazine issues handling

On 10/11/2016 10:05 AM, Eduard Lucena wrote: > Hi Marketing and Magazine teams, > > Since we decided to split Magazine from Marketing, having Magazine ML and > IRC Channel separate from Marketing (Marketing meeting for August 30, 2016) > we were working really fine. But now we hit a stone, Magazine have no > Pagure or trac to follow tickets/issues. > > For now, we are working with Marketing Pagure, and we have 3 issues related > to the Magazine: > 208, 233, and 239. > > The idea with this mail is to discuss with both teams if we should split > magazine's issues from Marketing Pagure, being Magazine still a subproject > of Marketing. > > Br, > Hey Eduard, thanks for starting this thread. I'll rehash what I said in the meeting, but I think that a Pagure repository specific to the Fedora Magazine isn't necessary. Even though the Magazine is still a little more split off from Fedora Marketing, I believe that it is still a "sub-sub-project" of Marketing. A lot of interests that Marketing may have now and in the future may be of interest for the Fedora Magazine. I also think a Trac just for the Magazine won't be heavily used. Anything technical can be filed on the Fedora Infrastructure Pagure, and Magazine editors can take a look on the Fedora Marketing Pagure too (there's a fair bit of overlap). This is my 2¢ but I'm open to what others think would work best or is least confusing.